Heart bleeds for Musk

[motorbiking]

Not according to the legal system.

1 day you will get there

Being guilty and escaping by a technicality would normally indicate a person being arrested, charged and tried in a criminal court for the crime. At the very least I’d expect him to have been arrested.

An example would be a prosecutor failing to bring a charge within the required time limit.

Not the BS you are eating up

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Being guilty and escaping by a technicality would normally indicate a person being arrested, charged and tried in a criminal court for the crime. At the very least I’d expect him to have been arrested.

An example would be a prosecutor failing to bring a charge within the required time limit.

Not the BS you are eating up

Simply, is he

An adjudicated rapist ?

Or isn't he ? Let's try and cut through the fog

 

[Highway Man]

Simply, is he

An adjudicated rapist ?

Or isn't he ? Let's try and cut through the fog

in criminal law it can mean a conviction or a specific type of deferred judgment. It is an alternative where a defendant completes a court-ordered program, and if successful, the charges are dismissed, potentially preventing a criminal record.

 

[motorbiking]

Simply, is he

An adjudicated rapist ?

Or isn't he ? Let's try and cut through the fog

There is no such concept in criminal law.

 

[Highway Man]

Therefore he is not a rapist nor can he be called one..

 

[carmanmemoranda]

There is no such concept in criminal law.

Are you talking USA or UK ?

It's a term that he CAN be called, legally.

If you don't like it, take it up with the USA

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Therefore he is not a rapist nor can he be called one..

See above

 

[motorbiking]

Are you talking USA or UK ?

It's a term that he CAN be called, legally.

If you don't like it, take it up with the USA

clueless.

 

[Knave of Hearts]

The fact is Trump has never been arrested, charged, tried or convicted of rape. There are plenty of reasons to attack him, but no need to make stuff up or pretend that something means something else.

He has been found liable for sexual assault in a court.
Anyone who sexually assaults women, and thinks it's OK, is easily capable of increasing his degree of attack to rape, by USA definition.
By UK definition he'd already have been convicted of rape.
If you feel it's OK to excuse and support him and his behaviour, that's up to you.

I wouldn't trust a person like you to tell me the time, never mind offer legal advice.

 

[Brigadier]

Therefore he is not a rapist nor can he be called one..

Eh?


In order to be convicted of rape (and provided that the conviction is safe), someone first has to be a rapist.

The absence of a conviction doesn't mean the absence of the crime.

 

[noseall]

Is Trump a rapist?

A = yes.

 

[Highway Man]

Eh?


In order to be convicted of rape (and provided that the conviction is safe), someone first has to be a rapist.

The absence of a conviction doesn't mean the absence of the crime.

So we could call you a rapist and that's ok is it

 

[Highway Man]

Is Trump a rapist?

A = yes.

B = No

 

[Knave of Hearts]

So we could call you a rapist and that's ok is it

On what basis?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Is Trump a rapist?

A = yes.

Only the farage/trump apologists are trying to prove otherwise, despite all the evidence.