ICE told to get the eff out

  • Thread starter Thread starter JP_
  • Start date Start date
Like the Labour Party cancelling elections.
Nothing like that at all. You know why they want to delay the elections, so not worth saying again. But if it was any other way, you'd be moaning about the waste of time and tax payers money!
 
I wasn't aware of ice until this shooting.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Trump recently gave it 45 billion dollars of funding, making the organisation effectively one of the largest armies in the world. This is how seriously they take tackling the immigration problem.

Meanwhile in Britain we send billions to foreign countries, and spend billions every month making foreigners comfortable in Britain.
 
You are an anti-Trump, pro-Immigrant, pro-drugs, criminal-sympathising, do-gooding, university indoctrinated, interfering left-wing loony. You cannot possibly be objective.
And then there’s Spline and Highway man and Katherine Levitt
 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Trump recently gave it 45 billion dollars of funding
They need it. It's running at a huge net loss. It's a bit like the UK's Brexit but a lot worse. Trumps' ICE initiative will die with him, probably after the mid-terms.
 
That is the focus of the federal investigation
18 U.S.C. § 372

The federal investigation is into whether Renee and Becca had any ties to groups which are legally monitoring the ICE agents. It is a mud throwing exercise.

But it is utterly irrelevant to the point being discussed.

Yesterday, you seemed to be making progress. You said that, from the videos you had seen, there was no evidence that Renee had actually obstructed the agents. You admitted that you couldn't explain how somebody parked more than a hundred yards away could be attempting to obstruct the agents. But then you argued that, because you couldn't think of another explanation why she was parked in that way, this meant that the agents would have had a reasonable suspicion that she must be attempting to obstruct them.
 
The federal investigation is into whether Renee and Becca had any ties to groups which are legally monitoring the ICE agents. It is a mud throwing exercise.

But it is utterly irrelevant to the point being discussed.

Yesterday, you seemed to be making progress. You said that, from the videos you had seen, there was no evidence that Renee had actually obstructed the agents. You admitted that you couldn't explain how somebody parked more than a hundred yards away could be attempting to obstruct the agents. But then you argued that, because you couldn't think of another explanation why she was parked in that way, this meant that the agents would have had a reasonable suspicion that she must be attempting to obstruct them.
Actually it was you that had said all of that, MBK has more of a grip on the reality of this incident than yourself obviously. You are merely clutching at straws. You were agreeing that the first shot was legal a few pages ago, now all shots were illegal according to you, yet how odd that this man is not sat behind bars.
 
They need it. It's running at a huge net loss. It's a bit like the UK's Brexit but a lot worse. Trumps' ICE initiative will die with him, probably after the mid-terms.
In essence, ICE does not turn a "profit" or "loss" in a commercial sense, but it is currently operating at a budgetary deficit due to the high costs of increased detention and removal operations.
 
Back
Top