They haven't got a policy to destroy schools or hospitals, but they destroy lots of schools and hospitals.Could you provide a link to that policy John?
They haven't got a policy to destroy schools or hospitals, but they destroy lots of schools and hospitals.Could you provide a link to that policy John?
They haven't got a policy to destroy schools or hospitals, but they destroy lots of schools and hospitals.

was about to give the answer filly has just given, it is really quite simple however horrific it sounds.They haven't got a policy to destroy schools or hospitals, but they destroy lots of schools and hospitals.
Without any thought it seems for the 10s of thousands of innocent victims.Any building used for military purposes is a legitimate military target.
So not civilian bridges used by civilians then.Any building used for military purposes is a legitimate military target.

If it is used to transport military equipement and personel then it is a dual purpose and is a legitimate targetSo not civilian bridges used by civilians then.
If it is used to transport military equipement and personel then it is a dual purpose and is a legitimate target
So not civilian bridges used by civilians then.
How many times do you need reminding.Any building used for military purposes is a legitimate military target.
No, it isn't.If it is used to transport military equipement and personel then it is a dual purpose and is a legitimate target

Whatever you have read on Google is wrong, bridges are very often legitimate targets and are attacked in war. There are specialist units that are actualy are trained to destroy bridges.How many times do you need reminding.
It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population whatever the motive.
It looks like Israel is clearing the area to provide a buffer zone, a dmz, to prevent further attacks by Hezbollah. Ethnically cleansing the area of civilians is the least of their worries.No, it isn't.
It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population whatever the motive.

No, it isn't.
It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population whatever the motive.

Pay attention to article (6)No, it isn't.
It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population whatever the motive.

It's like there is so much racism on here, but so few racists.They haven't got a policy to destroy schools or hospitals, but they destroy lots of schools and hospitals.
whatever the motivePay attention to article (6)