Israel spots a journalist!

They haven't got a policy to destroy schools or hospitals, but they destroy lots of schools and hospitals.
was about to give the answer filly has just given, it is really quite simple however horrific it sounds.
 
Any building used for military purposes is a legitimate military target.
How many times do you need reminding.
It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population whatever the motive.
 
If it is used to transport military equipement and personel then it is a dual purpose and is a legitimate target
No, it isn't.
It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population whatever the motive.
 
How many times do you need reminding.
It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population whatever the motive.
Whatever you have read on Google is wrong, bridges are very often legitimate targets and are attacked in war. There are specialist units that are actualy are trained to destroy bridges.
 
No, it isn't.
It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population whatever the motive.
It looks like Israel is clearing the area to provide a buffer zone, a dmz, to prevent further attacks by Hezbollah. Ethnically cleansing the area of civilians is the least of their worries.
 
No, it isn't.
It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population whatever the motive.

AI Overview

Yes, a bridge used by civilians
can be attacked in a war if it becomes a legitimate military objective, but such attacks are strictly regulated by International Humanitarian Law (IHL). While civilian infrastructure is generally protected, bridges often serve a dual-use function, and their legal status changes based on how they are used.
Duke Law Scholarship Repository +4

When a Bridge Becomes a Legal Target
Under IHL, a bridge—even one used by civilians—can be targeted if it meets the criteria for a military objective:
ICRC
  • Military Purpose: The bridge is used by the enemy for moving troops, military supplies, or weapons.
  • Military Advantage: Its destruction, capture, or neutralization offers a "definite military advantage" in the specific situation.
  • Tactical Importance: It is crucial to the defending forces for logistical support or maneuvering.
    Lieber Institute West Point +3
 
Back
Top