- Joined
- 30 May 2024
- Messages
- 4,571
- Reaction score
- 1,814
- Country

And Iran would target them if they could. And would be justified too.So that would be every bridge in Israel.

And Iran would target them if they could. And would be justified too.So that would be every bridge in Israel.
I'll just repeat my earlier post. It is quite clear.If t is used to transport soldiers and equipment accross them as a regular route, yes of course it would. Which bridge are you thinking of in Israel?

google is wrong. shock horror, oh hang on it could be you that has misinterpreted what has happened to that legitimate targetI'll just repeat my earlier post. It is quite clear.
A quick Google says this;
It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population whatever the motive.

God only knows how he would react if they hit a corner shop.It's a ******g bridge.
To use it as a convenient excuse for assassinating more journalists, i'd say.Indeed. So why would they want to destroy it again?

A ridiculous statement.To use it as a convenient excuse for assassinating more journalists, i'd say.
israel has a policy to uphold on that matter.
Have you ever stopped to consider, that it just might be you who is wrong?google is wrong. shock horror, oh hang on it could be you that has misinterpreted what has happened to that legitimate target

No never, have you?Have you ever stopped to consider, that it just might be you who is wrong?
Do you even understand the meaning of whatever the motive? That's a rhetorical question.
See post#38The journalist was a stu-pid mor on. They take out a bridge with a missile and the idiot goes up to it to do a "piece to camera with it in the background when he can clearly see that the "job is not completed" risking his life for the sake of his Russian journo job, and sure enough another missile hits exactly the same spot as the previous wreckage. And then that allows anti UK and pro Arab/ Russian posters to spread propaganda and proclaim "Israel spots a journalist"

See post ±39See post#38
More JohnD propaganda

They shouldn't have been there in the first oplace. They put themselves in the danger zoneI wonder if tranny is attempting to pretend that the attack did not take place.
Or perhaps he is pretending that a bridge that has already been demolished benefits from having a missile fired at a nearby news crew.