- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 23,731
- Reaction score
- 3,394
- Country
Nothing suggests that is the case. Makes a good conspiracy theory though.
"The allegations against Savile were dealt with by local police and a reviewing lawyer for the CPS."
- Status
"The allegations against Savile were dealt with by local police and a reviewing lawyer for the CPS."
D
Deleted member 317777
So he wasn’t head of the CPS at the time ?
And had previous connections to saville
Ok…
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 23,731
- Reaction score
- 3,394
- Country
Are you sure?
D
Deleted member 317777
Mr Starmer was head of the CPS when the decision was made not to prosecute Savile but he was not the reviewing lawyer for the case. An official investigation commissioned later by Starmer criticised both prosecutors and police for their handling of the allegations.
Argue with full fact
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 23,731
- Reaction score
- 3,394
- Country
Correct. Nothing to see here.
D
Deleted member 317777
So he was head of the CPS?
And stood back…. While saville wasn’t charged.
I thought as much.
You mean when Boris Johnson made up some rancid bullspizz
When Boris exposed Starmer’s failures on Jimmy Savile, the left erupted—now they’re doing it again. What are they hiding?
When Boris Johnson called out Keir Starmer’s failure to prosecute Jimmy Savile, Labour and the leftwing media created a political frenzy designed to silence him. Is it any wonder a national inquiry into the rape gangs has been denied? asks Claire Bullivant. Boris Johnson was right to call...conservativepost.co.uk
Keir Starmer was not responsible in any way shape or form for Saville not getting prosecuted.
You are just so easily taken in by right wing populism it’s laughable
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 23,731
- Reaction score
- 3,394
- Country
No. You literally just posted what full fact said.
It's funny to see the toryboys following the Dominic Cummings playbook that's being fed to Musk.
D
Deleted member 317777
One has to wonder though, as head of the CPS and with a case as large, important and in the media spot light.
What was more important? He obviously had something very, very pressing to deal with!
It’s almost like he hid away from it.
D
Deleted member 317777
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 23,731
- Reaction score
- 3,394
- Country
No, it isn't like that at all.
D
Deleted member 317777
That’s your opinion.
I’d say as head of the CPS he should have had his finger on the pulse.
Maybe the case wasn’t important enough, to him.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 23,731
- Reaction score
- 3,394
- Country
And where the evidence leads.
I wouldn't expect you to say anything less.
Or maybe, as per the evidence, he knew nothing about it.
- Status
