J D Vance. Munich speech.

[denso13]

I thought it was silent praying in the street?

If you mean why he was convicted, then no.

 

[Highway Man]

If you mean why he was convicted, then no.

Wasn't sure but it was something I heard on the radio whilst driving, I wasn't paying much attention I just heard something about it.

 

[Highway Man]

No it wasnt

If you aren’t sure you could always research the actual facts before posting.

Are you just this annoying normally? Do you know how to speak to people in a normal way or is everything just googled by you?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

They are but if you dont know it is ilegal to pray in the street I am not seeing a crime. I didnt know but then I dont pray loudly either so should be ok not knowing that law.

I don't think ignorance of the law is a valid defence.

I don't think she was ignorant of the law either.

So what do you call deliberate breaking of the law?

 

[Deleted member 265726]

I don't actually think that I am part of anyone's posse. When you think about it, I'm more of a lone ranger. Dispensing justice wherever I see fit. But always fairly and proportionally. If people get on the wrong side of me, I might call them pompous. If they really annoy me, I might even go so far as to call them arrogant. I know that's harsh, but those are my rules.

You think you are neutral sitting on the fence playing both sides. I think you are much more aligned with the left on here but not as cruel on the whole.

 

[Highway Man]

I don't think ignorance of the law is a valid defence.

I don't think she was ignorant of the law either.

So what do you call deliberate breaking of the law?

Strange question, I probably think of deliberately breaking the law as anyone elses train of thought. If you do not know there is a law that you are breaking it isn't deliberate.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Those laws will be abolished along with a lot of the other authoritarian regime when this administration changes. It can't come soon enough.

Let's hope not.

Women should have rights too. Shame they need laws to protect them like this

 

[MNW67]

Safe access buffer zones will make it illegal for anyone to do anything that intentionally or recklessly influences someone’s decision to use abortion services, obstructs them, or causes harassment or distress to someone using or working at these premises.

Protection zones around abortion clinics in place by October

Safe access buffer zones will be in force around abortion clinics from 31 October to bring in stronger safeguards for women accessing services.

www.gov.uk

Why can't these women be left in peace when they are facing a traumatic experience?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Strange question, I probably think of deliberately breaking the law as anyone elses train of thought. If you do not know there is a law that you are breaking it isn't deliberate.

And you can demonstrate it wasn't deliberate?

 

[denso13]

If you do not know there is a law that you are breaking it isn't deliberate.

The judge said it was deliberate, he knew exactly what he was doing.

 

[Highway Man]

And you can demonstrate it wasn't deliberate?

Well it wasn't me doing it so how could I?

 

[Highway Man]

The judge said it was deliberate, he knew exactly what he was doing.

I don't know how he drew that conclusion as surely this isn't a law that most people would know?

 

[Deleted member 265726]

Let's hope not.

Women should have rights too. Shame they need laws to protect them like this

I'm talking about exclusion zones not abortion.

 

[denso13]

I don't know how he drew that conclusion as surely this isn't a law that most people would know?

He notified the council the day before he did it. He knew what he was doing.

 

[MNW67]

You think you are neutral sitting on the fence playing both sides. I think you are much more aligned with the left on here but not as cruel on the whole.

It's a heart and head thing. My own ying and yang. One pulls me one way and vice versa. And I end up in the middle.