D
Deleted member 323070
Farage has been advertising the shortcomings in UK's asylum system.We have had a huge increase in both illegal and legal migration since Brexit. So, I suppose you are right![]()
Farage has been advertising the shortcomings in UK's asylum system.We have had a huge increase in both illegal and legal migration since Brexit. So, I suppose you are right![]()
That's 202 pages. Want to point to the relevant bit?Article 25 the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea allows states to take "necessary steps" to prevent passage that is not innocent.
here it is again. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
from your reference:I provided plenty of references... You none... as usual.
The Government has said that any plans will be “safe and legal”, but France and other interested parties have suggested such tactics could violate international law.
If it conflicts with an exisitng legal requirement, it will be illegal.For something to be illegal, there is usually a law to say so. I wonder why you cannot find it. Is it because it doesn't exist?

You are aware that the UK has advanced radar, drones and intelligence services focused on tracking them?Why have you suddenly introduced “boat at edge of French territorial waters”
SARs you mean.No they only have rights to enter French territorial water under rights of innocent passage, contravening French immigration laws is not innocent passage.
Try reading LOSC A17

Article twenty five, was it not clear when I said Article 25?
Article 25 the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea allows states to take "necessary steps" to prevent passage that is not innocent.
here it is again. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
UNCLOS A19 “Passage is innocent so long as it is not prejudicial to the peace, good order or security of the coastal State.”You are aware that the UK has advanced radar, drones and intelligence services focused on tracking them?
SARs you mean.
You are literally arguing push back is illegal and then saying France has the right to prevent a vessel engaged in SARs from docking in a French port.
if a vessel is considered in distress then push back is illegalYou are literally arguing push back is illegal and then saying France has the right to prevent a vessel engaged in SARs from docking in a French port.

Assuming you are correct and you aren't btw.if a vessel is considered in distress then push back is illegal
Im sure most small boats could be considered to be in distress

They are refused entry to UK waters, using the necessary steps.UNCLOS A19 “Passage is innocent so long as it is not prejudicial to the peace, good order or security of the coastal State.”
returning migrants is not innocent passage
The Tories had 14 years to reduce immigration, why didn't they do it.?Legal immigration can easily be reduced to a very low level.
The Tories had 14 years to reduce immigration, why didn't they do it.?
The Tories had 14 years to reduce immigration, why didn't they do it.?
Therein lies the problem.![]()
Why Britain can't just return migrants to France, as Reform says
Reform UK appears to be wrong to claim Britain can legally turn small boats back in the Channel.www.bbc.co.uk
That is the Elephant in the room that the politicians, including Reform, choose to ignore.Because they didn't want to and, the truth (which is uncomfortable for some) is that the UK can't do without it.
That is the Elephant in the room that the politicians, including Reform, choose to ignore.
Yeah they're both as sh1te as each other. Regardless of ones view of Reform, it's easy to see why some are attracted to them.Both Labour and Tories have been telling us for years how they are tough on immigration whilst actually wanting high migration.