Looks like there

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
andy11 said:
Three cheers for International law! Let em all come.
Click to expand...
Says andy who has no solution to displaced migrants who happily lived their lives before war or circumstance forced them to leave. Moan, moan ,moan goes andy.
 
andy11 said:
Three cheers for International law! Let em all come.
Click to expand...
where do you think they should go then Andy?

If you dont want them here, its fair to say then the French shouldnt have to take them, nor the Germans, nor the Turkish.....

So what is your solution -do the refugees just keep travelling until they drop dead?



You wont have an answer.
 
Sponsored Links
Justin Passing said:
Within the EU the Dublin Declaration says states can return people to safe states from which they have come - though it's woolly.
The EU can say we've left so it doesn't apply,
Click to expand...

UK is not a member of the Dublin Regulation (Regulation No. 604/2013), so it is no use your trying to cling to it now.
 
There in France than they can stay
There imo

do they know that the UK is not in the EU :confused:

so by all accounts and according to many ? They would be best off staying there :idea:
 
Great few minutes from Mark Steyn...


Steyn's main points:

  • Boris Johnson is concerned about the Maldives being submerged due to climate change and thinks he can do something about it
  • However, Boris won't take any action about the tide of immigrants washing up the shores of his own country
  • France blames Britain's "soft touch on migrants" for Calais residents' 20 year misery
  • A record number of migrants crossed the Channel and entered the country illegally in a single day: 853
  • This is about half the number of all babies born in England and Wales on that day
  • If it continues at that rate, we will have a third of a million immigrants a year
  • As 87% of the migrants are male, this will cause a male / female demographic imbalance similar to China's
  • "Asylum Seekers" must have a reasonable fear of persecution to avoid being sent home - yet they are happy to leave their women back home
 
JohnD said:
UK is not a member of the Dublin Regulation (Regulation No. 604/2013), so it is no use your trying to cling to it now.
Click to expand...
Already covered that - I said it didn't apply as we'd left. Still usable in legal argument though. Keep up!
 
Last edited:
Justin Passing said:
Already covered that - I said it didn't apply as we'd left
Click to expand...

as it doesn’t apply to the UK, it is a Brexit negative.

had we still been party to Dublin convention, we would’ve had some leverage over France for returning refugees arriving by boat.
 
Why are so many people so wound up about these refugees arriving by boat?

If the UK govt really wanted to deal with immigration, it would sort out visa overstayers - that’s what the bulk of illegal immigrants here are.
 
Justin Passing said:
Already covered that - I said it didn't apply as we'd left. Still usable in legal argument though. Keep up!
Click to expand...
It's only still usable in a pub argument. There is no law requiring refugees to claim asylum in the first safe country. They can pass through as many countries as they like to claim asylum.
How do you think refugees from many countries in South America, pass through Mexico to USA?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top