Man who punched female officer at Manchester airport jailed.

You wanted me to post an image of my nearest post box, which will have a unique identity number on it.
And because I refused, you imagined that I must live in Pakistan.

So you built a conspiracy theory around your imagined scenario. Sound familiar? :rolleyes:
You dont have to include any identifiable numbers on a post box.
Until you thought of that excuse you said that you were a house bound person who doesn’t own a phone and you only had one hand. :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
 
Dummy --- This is DEI and the reason for the little coppers.

In May 1990, the minimum height requirement was dropped by the Metropolitan Police, and other police forces had followed suit by September 1990. No British force now requires its recruits to be of any minimum height.
Dummy. The height restriction was dropped before the introduction of DEI as a policy.

But that's is irrelevant. You don't send two slightly built policewoman and one male officer to arrest two burly known violent offenders. :rolleyes:
 
Dummy. The height restriction was dropped before the introduction of DEI as a policy.
Its in action DEI before it was given its name
DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion ) is the meaningful shift towards fairness, equity
But that's is irrelevant. You don't send two slightly built policewoman and one male officer to arrest two burly known violent offenders. :rolleyes:
Right so its the little coppers own fault for getting their nose smashed to pieces then. - Keep defending your "brother"
 
Its in action DEI before it was given its name
DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion ) is the meaningful shift towards fairness, equity
About 10 years after the height restriction removed, the DEI policy was implemented. :rolleyes:
So the Met drop the height restriction, and ten years later someone thinks, 'Oh, we should give that policy a name.' :D
What did they call in other forces, and in other countries that also dropped the height restriction? :rolleyes:

Right so its the little coppers own fault for getting their nose smashed to pieces then. -
The person responsible for sending ill-equipped under-staffed officers should share some responsibility.
The officers that attended had little choice in attending.

Keep defending your "brother"
Still weaponising your imagined scenario of my situation because you are denied any real personal information of mine. :rolleyes:
 
I've stated for as long as I've been here, i do not reveal any personal information because people like you will weaponise.
And you've proven me to be sensible in my decision because in absence of any personal information, you imagine something, which you then weaponise. :rolleyes:


If you think weaponising your imagined personal information of others, and building on that to be abusive is your version of 'trying to inject a bit of humour', it's no wonder that you live alone in a bedsit, with no friends, and need to imagine you're a dog. :rolleyes:
Obviously, going by your post, you can't read!
 
Back
Top