- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,816
- Reaction score
- 5,356
- Country

So it will need an off-line mode. Dead before it starts.And non-repudabilidy, availability, data quality, MFA and a whole load of other things.
you haven't said what you like.This isn't simple, there are real advantages to both the users and the government for this system as well as risks. I don't know how well it stacks up, but we've been heading this way for decades.
Today, you have driving license, passport, other photo ID, utility bills, etc. All providing you with separation of duty, because the ID controllers are distributed. If I want to take your ID from inside, Its harder because I need at least 50 or 60 people in the hack. If tomorrow that is replaced with one single form of ID I can target maybe 1 - 3 people. Given the DBA's will likely be outsourced contractors - easy peasy.Defence in depth doesn't really apply here as digital ID doesn't preclude it nor separation of duty either. You might be thinking about compatmentalisation.
Its not like government departments aren't frequently hacked.