You seemed keen to introduce those figures not me boyo. And now you seem to want to dismiss them.Nonsense. You are ignoring everything they are saying. Chapter 6. Has got your name all over it.
Less than 2%.
You seemed keen to introduce those figures not me boyo. And now you seem to want to dismiss them.Nonsense. You are ignoring everything they are saying. Chapter 6. Has got your name all over it.
Which is the higher number 2% or 28%?Majority unknown.
You are ignoring everything they are saying
I do hope you stop lying, for your own sake.I do hope you never acquire 28% of a company and think it makes you a majority shareholder

My statement is correct. The only one telling lies is you. 100s of pages of pure Nosenout fiction.I do hope you stop lying, for your own sake.
...It is not white British males committing the majority of rape abuse against kids, via rape gangs. There are plenty of official reports confirming this and I have posted them for the forum idiots to appraise themselves of...."
Liar.
Nonsense.My statement is correct

I’ve posted pages and pages and the Casey report is full of evidence.Nonsense.
You have shown not one iota of evidence that it is remotely true. In fact every single link you have posted up says the exact opposite boyo.
FAIL.
Ive read the report too. Nowhere does it EVER say Pakistani grooming gangs hold a majority over white gangs. All data shows the polar opposite.I’ve posted pages and pages and the Casey report is full of evidence.
So did you boyo. Either its relevant or irrelevant. Either way it doesn't help your argument.You are now quoting an example that Casey used and described as misleading
Yes. Nationally, it changes nothing.You know she does actually post studies with reliable data and they show a substantial over representation of non white british male offenders
I'm as interested in the truth as the next man. I despise liars and lies such as this....
But you aren’t interested in the facts
That data is only in a few regions, not national.You know she does actually post studies with reliable data and they show a substantial over representation of non white british male offenders.
2.7% of the population.2%
28%
Guess which is the majority...?

You clearly haven’t. Because throughout the report it draws the conclusion that there is a problem with Asian gangs.Ive read the report too. Nowhere does it EVER say Pakistani grooming gangs hold a majority over white gangs. All data shows the polar opposite.
So did you boyo. Either its relevant or irrelevant. Either way it doesn't help your argument.
Yes. Nationally, it changes nothing.
I'm as interested in the truth as the next man. I despise liars and lies such as this...
...It is not white British males committing the majority of rape abuse against kids, via rape gangs. There are plenty of official reports confirming this and I have posted them for the forum idiots to appraise themselves of...."

She says this after showing what can be concluded from those reports with accurate ethnic data. Sh does not question the accuracy of those reports with good quality ethnic data. Most of which identify non-white offenders as being significantly over represented.That data is only in a few regions, not national.
Also Casey says it needs further investigation, ergo the data is not reliable
No doubt. I have not said there isn't.there is a problem with Asian gangs.
I'd much rather own 28% than 2%.I do hope you never acquire 28% of a company and think it makes you a majority shareholder
It doesn’t say it accurate.accurate ethnic data
Yes she doesSh does not question the accuracy of those reports
You mean based small, localised limited data.Most of which identify non-white offenders as being significantly over represented.