You're making things up again. But yes, we can add 'its all big businesses fault' to the conspiracy theory list.
New lockdown in sight
- Thread starter johnny2007
- Start date
Sponsored Links
It's not a theory, it's a fact.
Have you been to the high street recently or you're still locked indoors with windows and doors sealed?
A fact! Why didn't you say so? I thought it was just some crap you had made up without any sources.
It's a conspiracy theory, you have zero evidence other than 1 anecdotal story that in your mind you have reinforced with confirmation bias.
Next you will be telling us it's a plot by Soros and the Gates foundation to force us into having the vaccine.
Sponsored Links
Is there any point in answering?
Whatever anyone says that doesn't align with your twisted mind is crap, so...
you are the one peddling the crap.
If you want a proper debate, I can back mine up with facts and evidence drawn from scientists, virologists.
where do you get yours from
Same environment as yours, just of the opposite opinion.
But of course you must be right and everyone else is an idiot.
The attitude of a very intelligent person, carry on.
That's an interesting "fact."
To back it up, please tell me how revenue and profits in the FTSE100 are higher this than they were in the first half of last year.
Start with Shell, please.
Then Glaxo.
That's an interesting "fact."
To back it up, please tell me how revenue and profits in the FTSE100 are higher this year than they were in the first half of last year.
Start with Shell, please.
Then Glaxo.
You're always asking for evidence.
What about YOUR evidence???
Every time you're challenged you post a lot of links of news article and similar minded people like you.
You can do the same for the opposite view.
Use google and you'll find lots and lots of news contrasting with your views and scientists whose opinion is exactly the opposite of that of your favourite.
It's pick and choose.
I speak for real life experience, don't believe half a word of the news, Facebook or "scientists" making all sort of claims.
Remember your most loved child, the "GLOBAL WARMING"???
An example:
Isn't it irritating that these stations are on 24 hours a day but always "run out of time"?
Isn't it irritating that these stations are on 24 hours a day but always "run out of time"?
Interesting interview on a number of SARS-Cov-2 aspects this morning (starting at 1007; get it on BBC Sounds), on R5L, with former Justice of the Supreme Court, Lord Jonathan Sumption.
His stance was that lockdowns do not serve any purpose, beyond buying time for the health service to gear-up to sufficient capacity.
And, now that ours has done so, any further lockdowns merely postpone the cases until after the next easing, rather than prevent them full-stop.
His stance was that lockdowns do not serve any purpose, beyond buying time for the health service to gear-up to sufficient capacity.
And, now that ours has done so, any further lockdowns merely postpone the cases until after the next easing, rather than prevent them full-stop.
Yes, that was the reason given at the time - to 'flatten the curve'.
S
sodthisforfun
Yep, Notch is wrong.
Am all for slowing the spread in a lot of ways. Don't overwhelm the NHS with cases in hospital which could still happen if we continue to get the daily case count we are getting (and it's spreading to 50-somethings now from the kids), as well as those who seem to be left with long-term side effects. Also, time allows continuing learning about the best way to treat people and perhaps, if we're really really lucky, to develop a vaccination.
Agree, but his point is that now the NHS does have the capacity to deal with expected cases.
From that point-of-view, further lockdown is buying time that has already been bought.
Sponsored Links
