Rachel Reeves budget

[johnny2007]

You know, if you lot put some effort into making intelligent, cogently presented, arguments, instead of spinning round and round spraying out this insane froth, you might actually produce something worthwhile.

You might not, of course, but you'd have a better chance.

If two posters express the same critical attitudes towards your positions, that's because there are two people with the same critical attitudes towards your positions, not one person pretending to be two.

No point with you.
When I've made coherent posts with you in the room, you've altered my post and quoted only part of it to push your nonsense.
You got caught and tried to defend the indefensible.
This proved to everyone how thick you are and always been under all your previous identities.
Nothing more to say and no point engaging in any sort of meaningful conversation with a racist bigot in drags like you.

 

[SPLINE]

Wrong.

UC is paid to people on a low income. That includes people who are unemployed and looking for work as well as some people who do work but receive low pay, or some people with a long-term illness or disability.

You have done a BBC style mis-qoute of me Himmy! Are you trying to foment hatred or something?

 

[Notch7]

you display the same mental illness

Personal attacks are contrary to the rules of this forum

 

[Notch7]

looks like the economy is doing better than previously thought so Rachel Reeves wont need to raise income tax