It does if you have a resistance fault!Thanks AdrianUK.
However it doesn't explain why it trips with nothing connected.
Wot dat?It does if you have a resistance fault!
Not possible.1 - the ring is complete (both L & N) - zero ohms.
How do they work?2 - neither L nor N connect to any other circuit on the CU
3 - L-E, and N-E, and L-N all measure 38M for the ring.
4 - connected L&N across all the CU and the measure 34M between LN-E.
True, but we know what he means. Presumably he doesn't have a means of measuring very low resistances. In fact, he seems to have undertaken a true 'continuity test'Not possible.1 - the ring is complete (both L & N) - zero ohms.
I imagine he means 'after the L & N of the circuit in question have been disconnected from the CU - i.e. there are no cross-connections with any other circuit.How do they work?2 - neither L nor N connect to any other circuit on the CU
Does seem a bit surprising. I wonder what is the highest resistance his IR tester can display?3 - L-E, and N-E, and L-N all measure 38M for the ring.
Again odd, particularly given his results in (3) above. Again, I wonder what is the highest resistance his IR tester can display.4 - connected L&N across all the CU and the measure 34M between LN-E.
As he has an IR tester I assumed it would take low ohms measurement.True, but we know what he means. Presumably he doesn't have a means of measuring very low resistances. In fact, he seems to have undertaken a true 'continuity test'
Possibly or even probably but, pedantically, not what was said and how can he be certain.I imagine he means 'after the L & N of the circuit in question have been disconnected from the CU - i.e. there are no cross-connections with any other circuit.How do they work?2 - neither L nor N connect to any other circuit on the CU
It won't be 38.Does seem a bit surprising. I wonder what is the highest resistance his IR tester can display?3 - L-E, and N-E, and L-N all measure 38M for the ring.
More than 34.Again odd, particularly given his results in (3) above. Again, I wonder what is the highest resistance his IR tester can display.4 - connected L&N across all the CU and the measure 34M between LN-E.
I didn't think that (m)any 'standalone' IR tests had such a facility?As he has an IR tester I assumed it would take low ohms measurement.
True - but do you mean "how can we be certain" ?Possibly or even probably but, pedantically, not what was said and how can he be certain.
One wouldn't think so, but identical answers for L-N, L-E and N-E would seem very improbable!It won't be 38.Does seem a bit surprising. I wonder what is the highest resistance his IR tester can display?
Well, we know it's at least 38MΩ! My point was that if the true IR of three results for individual pairs of conductors which were displayed as 38M were actually >38MΩ, then 34MΩ for L+N/E would be a little more credible.More than 34.Again odd, particularly given his results in (3) above. Again, I wonder what is the highest resistance his IR tester can display.
Oh. I thought they all did. I may be wrong.I didn't think that (m)any 'standalone' IR tests had such a facility?As he has an IR tester I assumed it would take low ohms measurement.
No. I meant, whilst looking for a fault, how can he be certain.True - but do you mean "how can we be certain" ?Possibly or even probably but, pedantically, not what was said and how can he be certain.
Not possible.1 - the ring is complete (both L & N) - zero ohms.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local