RCBO keeps tripping without reason

Thanks AdrianUK.
However it doesn't explain why it trips with nothing connected.
 
Sponsored Links
A neutral-earth fault could do that... the current which flows through the fault need not have come from the circuit in question. I know that seems a strange answer at first, but it becomes apparent why if you draw out the fault path
 
Sponsored Links
OK some observations and test results.
Observations -
during the evening last night the RCBO kept tripping with nothing plugged in (or DP off)
but during the night, I put the boiler on and wife put the dishwasher on - but the RCBO stayed on all night!!!

Tests
1 - the ring is complete (both L & N) - zero ohms.
2 - neither L nor N connect to any other circuit on the CU
3 - L-E, and N-E, and L-N all measure 38M for the ring.
4 - connected L&N across all the CU and the measure 34M between LN-E.

The max age of the wiring in the house is about 28 years
 
Your insulation test results...... taken with a proper insulation tester @ 500V or with a multimeter on 'ohms' range?
 
Tracing obscure reasons for RCD and RCBO tripping requires careful examination of insulation resistance between ALL conductors and ground / earth. This requires disconnection of both Live and Neutral at the consumer unit before insulation resistance tests are carried out.


The fault shown is a dead short. In reality a resistive fault will also cause a trip as will capacitive faults.

Almost all insulation resistance testing is performed with a DC test voltage. This will find resistive leakage paths but will not find leakage paths involving capacitive effects which the RCD will find and react to by tripping.
 
1 - the ring is complete (both L & N) - zero ohms.
:?: Not possible.
True, but we know what he means. Presumably he doesn't have a means of measuring very low resistances. In fact, he seems to have undertaken a true 'continuity test' :)
2 - neither L nor N connect to any other circuit on the CU
:?: How do they work?
I imagine he means 'after the L & N of the circuit in question have been disconnected from the CU - i.e. there are no cross-connections with any other circuit.
3 - L-E, and N-E, and L-N all measure 38M for the ring.
:?:
Does seem a bit surprising. I wonder what is the highest resistance his IR tester can display?
4 - connected L&N across all the CU and the measure 34M between LN-E.
:?:
Again odd, particularly given his results in (3) above. Again, I wonder what is the highest resistance his IR tester can display.

Kind Regards, John
 
True, but we know what he means. Presumably he doesn't have a means of measuring very low resistances. In fact, he seems to have undertaken a true 'continuity test' :)
As he has an IR tester I assumed it would take low ohms measurement.

2 - neither L nor N connect to any other circuit on the CU
:?: How do they work?
I imagine he means 'after the L & N of the circuit in question have been disconnected from the CU - i.e. there are no cross-connections with any other circuit.
Possibly or even probably but, pedantically, not what was said and how can he be certain.

3 - L-E, and N-E, and L-N all measure 38M for the ring.
:?:
Does seem a bit surprising. I wonder what is the highest resistance his IR tester can display?
It won't be 38.

4 - connected L&N across all the CU and the measure 34M between LN-E.
:?:
Again odd, particularly given his results in (3) above. Again, I wonder what is the highest resistance his IR tester can display.
More than 34. :D
 
As he has an IR tester I assumed it would take low ohms measurement.
I didn't think that (m)any 'standalone' IR tests had such a facility?
Possibly or even probably but, pedantically, not what was said and how can he be certain.
True - but do you mean "how can we be certain" ?
Does seem a bit surprising. I wonder what is the highest resistance his IR tester can display?
It won't be 38.
One wouldn't think so, but identical answers for L-N, L-E and N-E would seem very improbable!
Again odd, particularly given his results in (3) above. Again, I wonder what is the highest resistance his IR tester can display.
More than 34. :D
Well, we know it's at least 38MΩ! My point was that if the true IR of three results for individual pairs of conductors which were displayed as 38M were actually >38MΩ, then 34MΩ for L+N/E would be a little more credible.

Whatever, I think we are agreed that the figures are rather odd!

Kind Regards, John
 
As he has an IR tester I assumed it would take low ohms measurement.
I didn't think that (m)any 'standalone' IR tests had such a facility?
Oh. I thought they all did. I may be wrong.


Possibly or even probably but, pedantically, not what was said and how can he be certain.
True - but do you mean "how can we be certain" ?
No. I meant, whilst looking for a fault, how can he be certain.
 
Thanks John for making mostly correct assumptions

1) - yes - continuity round the ring.
2) - yes - L&N disconnected from CU - then checked for cross-connections
3) - see below
4) - see below.

My meter has ranges from 20m >> zero ohms (multi-meter)
My insulation tester goes up to 2000M

After the first set of tests, I discovered the burglar alarm was still plugged in !!
So re-tested and checked insulation for each circuit individually disconnecting from CU as tested.
Fuse--------Circuit--------------- LN------------NE------------LE
1 -----------Shower ----------- >2000 ------- >2000 ------ >2000
2 -----------1st Fl Light ------- >2000 -------- 134 --------->2000
3------------Gnd Light -------- >2000 -------- 149 --------->2000
4 -----------Base Light -------- >2000 ------- >2000 ------>2000
5 -----------1st Fl Ring --------- 1600 --------- 780 ----------1200
6 -----------Gnd Ring ------------ 390 ---------- 34 ----------- 420
7 -----------Base Ring ---------- 1170 ---------1100 -------- 1000
8 -----------Cooker ----------- >2000 ------- >2000 ------>2000

9 -----------Freezer ----------- >2000 ------- >2000 ------>2000
10 ----------Frid/Freezer ------ >2000 ------- >2000 ------>2000
......All in M ohms

yes - I have swapped the RCBOs for gnd and 1st Floor - always gnd floor which trips.
The results above indicate the Gnd floor 'NE' is suspect - but cannot see anything. By the way all wiring is exposed in basement so didn't have to lift floor boards to visually inspect.
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top