Resistance is futile

Joined
11 Nov 2020
Messages
15,442
Reaction score
2,441
Location
Middle Earth
Country
United Kingdom
Which jobs will AI replace by 2030?

150px-Bad_Robot_Productions_Logo.svg.png
 
Yeah that is some techno-globalist shoite right there... universal basic income next.
 
Losing jobs to AI.
Large chunk of the voting base of Maga is blue collar so this will go down like a lead balloon if they start replacing their mechanical jobs with robots. Many of those jobs listed are working to low middle class jobs. I am getting worried.
 
Large chunk of the voting base of Maga is blue collar so this will go down like a lead balloon.

They won't care as long as they can own the libs.
 
When there is significant change to our working options, e.g. the demise of industry and rise of service jobs, we're told one will balance out the other. tbh I don't think we've ever fully recovered from the demise of our industrial past and I think the same thing could happen with AI. We're told people will transition into different roles, have more free time etc. Yeah, I remain to be convinced.

Having said all that, I don't doubt AI will bring many advantages.
 
Large chunk of the voting base of Maga is blue collar so this will go down like a lead balloon if they start replacing their mechanical jobs with robots. Many of those jobs listed are working to low middle class jobs. I am getting worried.
its ok, Trump is deporting millions of undocumented migrants, which make up 5% of the working population

So those Trump supporters can take up jobs like picking fruit, cleaning, delivery drivers............on migrants wages of $5 an hour
 
its ok, Trump is deporting millions of undocumented migrants, which make up 5% of the working population

So those Trump supporters can take up jobs like picking fruit, cleaning, delivery drivers............on migrants wages of $5 an hour
Funnily enough there's an 'experiment' that the orange one should have looked at...

Imagine if a sovereign nation decided to have a hissy fit and leave the biggest free trade market in the world...

Effectively kick out those pesky EU foreigners and watch as immigration figures plummet...

That happened didn't it?

And then watch the feckless indigenous folk pick up the mantle and head to the fields rather than let the crops rot...

That happened didn't it?

Those who voted for brexit and the RW loons across the world just don't get it!
 
Funnily enough there's an 'experiment' that the orange one should have looked at...

Imagine if a sovereign nation decided to have a hissy fit and leave the biggest free trade market in the world...

Effectively kick out those pesky EU foreigners and watch as immigration figures plummet...

That happened didn't it?

And then watch the feckless indigenous folk pick up the mantle and head to the fields rather than let the crops rot...

That happened didn't it?

Those who voted for brexit and the RW loons across the world just don't get it!
Level-headed people accept that immigration is required, always has been, likely always will be. It's illegal immigration folk are fed up with. And no, I'm not getting into yet another protracted discussion re legal/illegal migration.
 
Level-headed people accept that immigration is required, always has been, likely always will be. It's illegal immigration folk are fed up with. And no, I'm not getting into yet another protracted discussion re legal/illegal migration.
Correct.

I don't think anybody has ever wanted more uncontrolled immigration

The argument is about how to best address it
 
The US and the UK have refused to sign a declaration on “inclusive and sustainable” artificial intelligence at a landmark Paris summit, in a blow to hopes for a concerted approach to developing and regulating the technology. The document was backed by 60 other signatories on Tuesday, including France, China, India, Japan, Australia and Canada. A UK government spokesperson said the statement had not gone far enough in addressing global governance of AI and the technology’s impact on national security...although it appears more likely the UK took heed of the American VP when he criticised Europe’s “excessive regulation” of technology and warn against cooperating with China.

An unnamed Labour MP said: “I think we have little strategic room but to be downstream of the US.” They added that US AI firms could stop engaging with the UK government’s AI Safety Institute, a world-leading research body, if Britain was perceived to be taking an overly restrictive approach to the development of the technology.

The Guardian

As noted earlier in the thread:

Yeah that is some techno-globalist shoite right there... universal basic income next.

the fear of global governance lies at the heart of this refusal to sign an accord with other nations in developing and regulating the growth of AI across the world will be a major stumbling block in finding a balance between safe AI and AI safety for users, leaving gaps in the market for further rank abuse by nationalist and extremist interests.
 
Back
Top