Hello.
I won't bore you with too many details. I hope.
Permission was refused because it's a conservation area. I read the appeal process and wrongly thought because of the conservation area bit I had 6 months to appeal. Turned out it's 12 weeks and I've taken 15.
So, my architect says I can resubmit - for free - with supporting evidence. If it gets rejected again, then I'll get my appeal in.
Question is, what constitutes supporting evidence?
I was told many untruths by Planning and Conservation after the refusal. I have documented proof they were lying.
I'm setting it out as events that led up to the refusal, including and followed up by meetings, telephone conversations, written documents, FOI documents, photographs...
In short, it looks like an appeal, without actually saying, 'I'm appealing because...'
Does this seem okay, or will they just put it in the bin?
Thank you.
John
I won't bore you with too many details. I hope.
Permission was refused because it's a conservation area. I read the appeal process and wrongly thought because of the conservation area bit I had 6 months to appeal. Turned out it's 12 weeks and I've taken 15.
So, my architect says I can resubmit - for free - with supporting evidence. If it gets rejected again, then I'll get my appeal in.
Question is, what constitutes supporting evidence?
I was told many untruths by Planning and Conservation after the refusal. I have documented proof they were lying.
I'm setting it out as events that led up to the refusal, including and followed up by meetings, telephone conversations, written documents, FOI documents, photographs...
In short, it looks like an appeal, without actually saying, 'I'm appealing because...'
Does this seem okay, or will they just put it in the bin?
Thank you.
John