Starmer postpones elections even further in Reform areas...

[JP_]

You do know you're spinning things?

Seriously, you don't actually believe this guff do you?

There's no set end date for the restructuring stuff, and nothing to stop them delaying again next year. It's all just dog-ate-my-homework stuff.

But if these areas have the elections, and then restructure, they will need to immeditetely have new elections, or there'll be no democratically elected reps. What would be the point of that?

 

[Charlie George]

But if these areas have the elections, and then restructure, they will need to immeditetely have new elections, or there'll be no democratically elected reps. What would be the point of that?

2028 at the earliest, could be pushed back further

 

[aveatry]

But if these areas have the elections, and then restructure, they will need to immeditetely have new elections, or there'll be no democratically elected reps. What would be the point of that?

Why not delay the restructure completely until after the general election.

 

[motorbiking]

If they’d have had the elections when they were due they would have served almost a whole term by the time the delayed restructure is complete.

 

[motorbiking]

 

[JP_]

Why not delay the restructure completely until after the general election.

Probably because it'll never get done if it was delayed for elections. And it's a local government restructure, not central government.

 

[warey4life]

Some desperate barrel-scraping in that video!

Obviously we have free speech, or at least did before Starmer came along.

By the sound of this case, he was being pursued and harassed. Totally different, anyone with any sense can understand the difference.

This is my favourite Lee Anderson video: