- Joined
- 30 May 2022
- Messages
- 1,319
- Reaction score
- 782
- Country

The Dems were in power for four years and just sat on them.
I wonder why they didn't release them then?
I wonder why they didn't release them then?


The Dems were in power for four years and just sat on them.
I wonder why they didn't release them then?![]()

It is a good question. Maybe they are sick of taking the high ground and have decided to join Trump in the swamp.
He won’t sack her unless or until it’s in his political interests to do so. No one is unsackable if they are guilty of misconduct even though the charges might trumped up(literally).He could'nt - think about it.
If Bondi tells him whats in the files and its bad for trump and covers it up then she is guilty of perjury.
If Bondi does not tell him whats in the files and he fires her her only defence to the senate would be that he fired me before I could press charges.
And on the reverse
Trump tells Bondi to break the law and say pardons her..for covering up a crime - quick political death - Drain the swamp ?
Trump fires Bondi - then she is open to a senate investigation and claims that he fired her before she could press charges. longer death -Drain the swamp.
So they are stuck in a hole... and they are trying evey which way to get out of it, but it has to be together.. each holds the other hostage.
Because Bidden was an inherently decent person (as presidents go) who did not want to interfere with the work of independent law officers for political gain. That, and because he believed there was nothing of substance to the conspiracy theories. Which is why Trumpf attacking the Dems won’t help him a jot when the real threat to him is from his own supporters. It’s how dictators are often brought downThe Dems were in power for four years and just sat on them.
I wonder why they didn't release them then?![]()
Pretty simple it was a court case...Ghilsane maxwell, that took 3 years of Bidens presidency, remember her running off and hiding and they believed in the law, as Biden put it, from a review of the evidence there is no realistic prospect of convicting other persons unless we receive complaints, as epstien was dead who are you going to prosecute and with no victims coming forward the end.The Dems were in power for four years and just sat on them.
I wonder why they didn't release them then?![]()
Amazing that a man who considers himself a real estate genius couldn't read a building cost report. It took Powell about 30 seconds to point out the mistake. It just shows two things about Trump. How shoddy his work is and how the whole charade was to ambush and bully Powell. Powell more than held his own.
Pardoning a pedo is not likely to convince the maga’s that there is no deep state conspiracy when the person most closely associated with Epsteen is receiving the pardon. Trumpf is either very dumb and/or very desperate.
Only Trumpf could consider pardoning a pedo because there might be something in it for him. What does he expect her to say? He’s not a prosecutor or the police.Trump is refusing to deny it. There have been two straight days of meetings with Maxwell:
![]()
Trump: I’m allowed to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell
US president refuses to rule out granting clemency to disgraced British socialite in exchange for her testimonywww.telegraph.co.uk
Only Trumpf could consider pardoning a pedo because there might be something in it for him. What does he expect her to say? He’s not a prosecutor or the police.

That and perhaps getting her to confirm, although his name is on the list, he did nothing wrong.The only thing I can imagine is that he is going to try to get the DOJ to bring prosecutions against some of the people that the base really hate, such as Bill Clinton, using Maxwell as a star witness. It doesn't really matter if they ever go ahead. Just announcing it will buy him time. Simliar to his calls to prosecute Obama for treason.
Only Trumpf could consider pardoning a pedo because there might be something in it for him. What does he expect her to say? He’s not a prosecutor or the police.