I would appreciate a cogent, calm and non-partisan analysis.
They're as guilty as ***k.

I would appreciate a cogent, calm and non-partisan analysis.
The problem with your civilian /IDF "get out clause"Did they call for the death of Israeli civilians? I missed that.

They don't even have a choice but to be in the IDF. Apart from a few reasons that discount them.Members of the IDF are just doing a job. They are as human as anyone. Sons & daughters of someone and all will be appauled at this hate speach. Inciting violence and hatred is an offence, Calling for anyones death is disgusting and shows a complete lack of understanding of what they are doing. The IDF are professional soldiers fighting for their country and if they die doing that then it is a tragedy not something to chant about.
Yes I agree, State of Israel is guilty of genocideThey're as guilty as ***k.
I'd assert there is a difference, although I condone neither and yes, if he's found to be in breach of our laws on this, he should be prosecuted.So I assume people will be expecting them to get 3 years jail for their hate speech?
![]()
Who are Bob Vylan - the duo who led anti-IDF chant at Glastonbury?
Formed in Ipswich in 2017, the band rap about racism, homophobia, toxic masculinity, and far-right politics.news.sky.com
The irony:
"Formed in Ipswich in 2017, the band rap about racism, homophobia, toxic masculinity, and far-right politics."
One was singing at an event in the UK, saying death to the IDF, who are in Israel. In reality, what are the chances of there being any detrimental effect on the IDF through him saying this? Surely little to zero.
The other was tweeting in the UK, one would assume mainly for the eyes of those within the UK, about locations within the UK, suggesting set fire to all the f **** hotels full of the b **** for all I care. In reality, this had much more chance of creating a detrimental effect for anyone within these hotels, whether migrants and/or staff.
I'd assert there is a difference, although I condone neither and yes, if he's found to be in breach of our laws on this, he should be prosecuted.
One was singing at an event in the UK, saying death to the IDF, who are in Israel. In reality, what are the chances of there being any detrimental effect on the IDF through him saying this? Surely little to zero.
The other was tweeting in the UK, one would assume mainly for the eyes of those within the UK, about locations within the UK, suggesting set fire to all the f **** hotels full of the b **** for all I care. In reality, this had much more chance of creating a detrimental effect for anyone within these hotels, whether migrants and/or staff.
What's that? Cousin Mike is dead?
Yeah did you not hear? He managed to get himself a security job in one of those hotels housing migrants. A few idiots set about the place and he got killed in the mayhem.
Yeah, the extremist Jewish sects can skip conscription.The problem with your civilian /IDF "get out clause"
is that Israel's enemies make no such distinction because in their eyes all Israelis are IDF because they once were as being in the IDF is mandatory for all 18 years olds apart from just a few.
Why do people think that it's ok for the IDF to kill unarmed civilians but be immune from having people say hurty words about them?
The anger is palpable.
i wonder what these idealistic festival goers would think if Hamas arrived on the scene and started killing, raping and taking them hostage - after all it was a music festival in Israel where their terror attacks started