He's still confused about assisted dying when a medical prognosis gives no hope of recovery and taking your own life when all hope is lost.What's wrong with a choice ?
It's not compulsory
Give him time, he'll get there...
He's still confused about assisted dying when a medical prognosis gives no hope of recovery and taking your own life when all hope is lost.What's wrong with a choice ?
It's not compulsory

It is not illegal to procure various things that can cause a near painless suicide. It is not illegal to supply them, it is not illegal to take them.
And that is assisted dying, no matter how you dress it up. Nobody disagrees with it either, surelyIt is not illegal for a Hospice doctor/nurse to give you a big dose of whatever so that you sleep through your last moments.
But it's a choiceThe bill which empowers a person diagnosed with 6 months to live having spent their last few good months dealing with forms, doctors and the family court, to apply for a "divorce from life". gains very little if they can even get the approval in a meaningful timeframe.

I'm still not sure what blups position actually is on the principle of assisted dying itself.He's still confused about assisted dying when a medical prognosis gives no hope of recovery and taking your own life when all hope is lost.
Give him time, he'll get there...

If that is your definition of assisted dying, it is already lawful under palliative care. Denso, has confirmed, he perceived "generous" dosing to achieve a swift painless end, without discussion with the dying person. In my own experience, it was discussed.And that is assisted dying, no matter how you dress it up. Nobody disagrees with it either, surely
But it's a choice

You did say this though,If that is your definition of assisted dying, it is already lawful under palliative care.
Medical Examiner's office was established pretty much with Shipman in mind. Too risky for a Hospice doctor/nurse to administer a lethal dose and risk external testing of the body.


We were told repeatedly by the staff that "we are not allowed to up the morphine on our own. But if you have any concerns at all about pain or suffering just tell us and then we can act". And they did, but there was of course no regulation or oversight of it.Denso, has confirmed, he perceived "generous" dosing to achieve a swift painless end, without discussion with the dying person.
I don't think anyone's been convicted of taking someone to SwitzerlandYou have the right to commit suicide and have someone assist you?
You have not only lost the argument you have also lost the plot!If you are determined to go you will go, its not a holiday destination

They shouldn't have to. Do you think the Swiss are right to give that choice?I don't think anyone's been convicted of taking someone to Switzerland
I don't know anything about the Swiss system and wouldn't presume to lecture them on their internal affairsThey shouldn't have to. Do you think the Swiss are right to give that choice?
Maybe not, but subjected to months/years of not knowing if they would be charged? - yes!I don't think anyone's been convicted of taking someone to Switzerland
LolYou have not only lost the argument you have also lost the plot!

You are just avoiding the issue now. No one mentioned lecturing the Swiss.I don't know anything about the Swiss system and wouldn't presume to lecture them on their internal affairs
I dont think the CPS have the slightest interest in prosecuting a genuine visitor to the swiss clinicMaybe not, but subjected to months/years of not knowing if they would be charged - yes!
Have you no compassion?
I think the answer to that question is obvious!