Trump deports dangerous hardened criminal

[MNW67]

The father, being a US citizen, with a child who is also a usa citizen has more rights (right or wrong, but it's how the USA works) than the mother, especially as she is not a USA citizen.

Whether those in charge will uphold their constitutuonal rights is another matter.

Is the father a US citizen. His status wasn't clear to me. The report I read simply said he was in the country legally.

 

[Notch7]

Is the father a US citizen. His status wasn't clear to me. The report I read simply said he was in the country legally.

They havent made that clear.

However I cant see how the baby could have American citizenship unless one of the parents was a citizen

 

[MNW67]

They havent made that clear.

However I cant see how the baby could have American citizenship unless one of the parents was a citizen

Born in the USA. Birthright citizenship.

 

[Lirefighter]

Nonsense, that's semantics. The court are questioning whether the correct procedures were followed and whether the mother and child were forcibly, and wrongly, removed from the US.

It's not semantics at all. A deported person cannot legally return to the US before 10yrs after the deportation date.
The child can return anytime.
Therefore they have not been deported.
The mother wanted her child to go with her.

 

[fillyboy]

Nonsense, that's semantics.

You normally love semantics.

 

[denso13]

It's not semantics at all. A deported person cannot legally return to the US before 10yrs after the deportation date.
The child can return anytime.
Therefore they have not been deported.
The mother wanted her child to go with her.

So why has the Judge set a hearing date?

 

[Lirefighter]

So why has the Judge set a hearing date?

Has he? The article uses a lot of get out clauses such as 'allegedly', 'according to', 'reportedly', etc.
Maybe he's been misquoted?
Either way I think we can all agree that the mother, understandably, wanted the child to go with her.

 

[Stivino]

The mother wanted her child to go with her.

I don't believe that for a minute. Linky

 

[denso13]

Either way I think we can all agree that the mother, understandably, wanted the child to go with her.

We don't know that.

Has he? The article uses a lot of get out clauses such as 'allegedly', 'according to', 'reportedly', etc.
Maybe he's been misquoted?

Oh, look, he is worried they may have deported a US citizen, the child. Wat a pillock,

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.lawd.210781/gov.uscourts.lawd.210781.8.0.pdf

 

[denso13]

It's not semantics at all. A deported person cannot legally return to the US before 10yrs after the deportation date.
The child can return anytime.
Therefore they have not been deported.

So Chump is wrong? Citizens might be deported.

Trump admits it’s possible US citizens could be deported by mistake

The administration has already come under fire for lack of due process when deporting immigrants

www.independent.co.uk

 

[Lirefighter]

I don't believe that for a minute. Linky

Damn, you've got me.
No lawyer worth their salt would ever disobey their signing oath to never tell a lie.
A dishonest lawyer?
No, I won't believe it!
Sacrilege.

 

[denso13]

The child is a US citizen and is free to return to the US anytime.

Lirefighter claims US citizens can't be deported. Oh dear...

ICE Has Detained and Deported Thousands of US Citizens Since Its Founding

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) keeps making an inexcusable error: it has been deporting U.S. citizens by mistake.

immigrationimpact.com

 

[MNW67]

Lirefighter claims US citizens can't be deported. Oh dear...

Not legally, I believe. If a mistake happens, they have the right to return.

 

[denso13]

Not legally, I believe. If a mistake happens, they have the right to return.

I'm sure the two year old will get her lawyer onto it.

 

[MNW67]

I'm sure the two year old will get her lawyer onto it.

I don't actually think she was deported in the proper legal sense. The mother was deported and took the child with her. Whether the mother was bounced into that decision is another matter.