For the record I think
@Mottie 's response is the correct one. I find it irritating enough to go back to a customer's house to find problems caused by well meaning but incompetent relatives or neighbours; and that's even though I'd be paid to correct them. Your landlord may not react well if he/she believes you to have contributed to a problem. You may have read
somewhere that such and such a boiler is better than a.n.other, but a simple Google search of 'such and such boiler
problems' will no doubt contradict this in just about every case.
Leaving that to one side, and dealing with your landlord's heating problem, there appears to be a number of symptoms which have a common element to them, and that is
low flow through the boiler.
Low flow can be caused by a poor pump performance; despite its newness, all circularing pumps are designed to pump
water, not air.
If the loft (header) tank has run dry there will be a lack of water to pump.
If the feed pipe between loft tank and heating system is blocked the water from a fully functioning header tank can not get into the system, therefore leading to a lack of water to pump.
If the heating water if full of s.h.1.t.e (sometimes called sludge, or debris) then the pump will not pump it effectively, leading to low flow.
If the pump impellor is substantially blocked with debris released by a cleaning agent then it will not pump effectively; no prizes for guessing what that leads to.
If the hydraulic circuit that the pump is connected to is restricted there will be low flow.
The slower speed the pump runs at, the lower will be its flow output.
A pump impellor may become unbalanced by debris, and an unbalanced impellor will cause excessive vibration/noise.
If the boiler has a semi-blocked heat exchanger this contributes towards a restricted hydraulic circuit.
Do you need more convincing?
Read up on the specific heat capacity of water, and the relationship between Joules and Watts; then you can work out why low flow through the boiler leads to a rapid rise in
boiler water temperature.
Now to the only piece of evidence that contradicts the low flow theory:
the boiler display shows a slow temperature rise on first firing, but on subsequent firings the temperature rises rapidly.
Why doesn't it rise rapidly on first firing? Could it be that you (or the control system) turn the boiler power OFF overnight? This would invoke the boiler's slow start-up routine (if it has one, and here my knowledge of the Vaillant system is limited), which would effectively give it minimum power output (small flame size) for several minutes. This would not be the case for subsequent firings.
Could it be that loose debris falls away from the pump or boiler overnight, but re-collects at a narrow point once circulation re-starts (highly unlikely, but possible).
Could it be something else?
If you are determined to go on an evidence gathering exercise then I suggest the following actions:-
1. At first start-up feel (or better,
measure) both the incoming water temperature (return temp) and the outgoing (flow temp).
Does the return temp warm up as the flow temp warms? Does it remain cool/cold?
2. Feel the temperature on the pipework between the pump and the 3-port valve. Does it also get hot rapidly as the boiler fires?
3. Bleed a little water from a radiator. Is it like coloured water, or more like mud?
4. Read up and learn how to change the pump speed. Does the vibration/noise correlate to pump speed? Is the pump set on a fixed or variable speed?
5. Read up on how to open a pump isolation gate valve, then make sure both pump valves are fully open.
6. Find the neutral point, where the cold feed from the header tank meets the system (usually just upstream of the pump). Will a fridge magnet attach itself to the copper pipe at that point?
7. Is there water in the header tank, and does it resemble mud? Is its level a couple of inches above the cold feed outlet pipe?
8. Is the water surface in the header tank lower than the level in the (larger) domestic cold water storage tank?
These are all relevant actions, and should lead to good evidence gathering for your landlord or his contractor, though I reiterate that
@Mottie was right, and there was absolutely no need to rear-up at his advice (given freely in his own time).
MM