Vote leave breaking the law

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
And no doubt the remain campaign were lily white with no rent a mob or any manipulation of the young voter.:)

For F***s sake why can't we all accept the situation and pull together for the best deal!

Most people did not want to go to war in 1939, but once decided they worked together as a team, it would have been no help to argue the pacifist cause any further. Most conscientious objectors also pitched in as medics or other non aggressive support workers.
 
footprints said:
And no doubt
Click to expand...

If you and your buddies have evidence to the contrary, no doubt you will be informing the proper authorities.

Have you done that?

No.

Any evidence?

No.

Perhaps you think your nonsense is a valid excuse for lawbreakers.
 
footprints said:
And no doubt the remain campaign were lily white with no rent a mob or any manipulation of the young voter.:)

For F***s sake why can't we all accept the situation and pull together for the best deal!

Most people did not want to go to war in 1939, but once decided they worked together as a team, it would have been no help to argue the pacifist cause any further. Most conscientious objectors also pitched in as medics or other non aggressive support workers.
Click to expand...

If you have evidence of the remain campaign breaking the law then bring it to the discussion. If you believe in the rule of law then uphold it at every juncture.

What best deal? You follow actual factual reports?
 
Sponsored Links
footprints said:
The best deal will not be reached if the UK can be seen to be divided and looking like it will back down under pressure.;)
Click to expand...

Which means what? The Government is negotiating - they have a team. How does what we discuss in the papers and news make them divided and what will this great deal be? It's never based on anything other than belief - not facts, and thus you don't need facts to argue your case as facts don't matter anymore in this world view of yours.
 
Isnt it a bit irrelevant?

£32m was spent about £16m leave and £15m or so remain
 
yes, I can certainly see why you'd like to sweep lawbreaking under the carpet, forget about it, do nothing.
 
Good grief are these remainers still here. PUTIN LOVES YOU! Begger off over there.
 
pete50 said:
Good grief are these remainers still here. PUTIN LOVES YOU! Begger off over there.
Click to expand...

Think you got that one mixed up.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...fluence-brexit-vote-detailed-us-senate-report

Russia’s attempts to influence British democracy and the potential vulnerability of parts of the UK political system to anti-democratic meddling during the EU referendum have been detailed in a report prepared by the US Senate.

The report by Democrats on the Senate foreign relations committee, titled Putin’s asymmetric assault on democracy in Russia and Europe: implications for US national security, pinpoints the way in which UK campaign finance laws do not require disclosure of political donations if they are from “the beneficial owners of non-British companies that are incorporated in the EU and carry out business in the UK”.
 
When is an election/referendum fair or not?

Whatever the outcome of this investigation into financial irregularities, one thing is for certain - this country has been dangerously divided for the forseeable future!

And that is because a few wealthy people/politicians with much to gain have played that same old game yet again - divide and rule!

As a remainer I can't accept what I perceive as a 'corrupted result', but neither can a leaver accept what they perceive as 'democratic process' being challenged...

So where do we go from here?

Surely the only way forward is to allow due legal process (under the current laws of our land) to run its course?
 
Q: We have invited Mark Zuckerberg to give evidence to parliament. He has offered to send someone else. Do you think it would be appropriate for him to appear?

May says this is an important issue. The committee should get the maximum committee to ask questions.

Q: So should he turn up?

May says Zuckerberg will decide for himself. But she hopes Facebook recognises why people are concerned about this.

Yes she is really tough.....
 
Notch7 said:
£32m was spent about £16m leave and £15m or so remain
Click to expand...
You have got your figures wrong before.

Notch7 said:
Isnt it a bit irrelevant?
Click to expand...
Democracy at work...
​
Mr Wylie claimed that the suspended chief executive of CA, Alexander Nix, had not been truthful to the committee when he claimed his company did not use Facebook data.

He said he also believed that AggregateIQ - a Canadian company that is closely linked to CA - played a "very significant" role in securing the UK's vote to leave the European Union in 2016.
​
 
Kankerot said:
Q: We have invited Mark Zuckerberg to give evidence to parliament. He has offered to send someone else. Do you think it would be appropriate for him to appear?
May says this is an important issue. The committee should get the maximum committee to ask questions.
Q: So should he turn up?
May says Zuckerberg will decide for himself. But she hopes Facebook recognises why people are concerned about this.
Yes she is really tough.....
Click to expand...
She's probably wary of being branded anti-semitist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top