- Joined
- 17 May 2012
- Messages
- 10,296
- Reaction score
- 752
- Country
OK, still thinking, planning, a house renovation.
I have had in another house a rear extension & moving of a kitchen, and a loft conversion. In both cases I hired a builder to do the lot.
I am wondering, would it be cheaper to "self build", but obviously not do anything myself (other than make tea!). e.g. for a new rear extension and kitchen conversion:
I guess the only way is to get a load of quotes ..... but, just wondering.
In my first build I had some issues. Part of my thinking is that working direct with specialists would mean a better job all round, and hopefully a better guarantee for work etc.
Is this "self build"?
I have had in another house a rear extension & moving of a kitchen, and a loft conversion. In both cases I hired a builder to do the lot.
I am wondering, would it be cheaper to "self build", but obviously not do anything myself (other than make tea!). e.g. for a new rear extension and kitchen conversion:
- hire demolition company to remove garage
- get a ground works company to do foundations and drainage, settle after building inspector gives thumbs up.
- Use a local bricklayer to do the shell
- Use local roofing firm for the ... roof.
- Get my favourite window company in to do the windows and doors
- Hire a carpenter for all internal walls, plasterboarding, ceiling etc.
- Sparky and plumber to set up the rads and kitchen
- Kitchen fitter (or same carpenter) to install kitchen.
I guess the only way is to get a load of quotes ..... but, just wondering.
In my first build I had some issues. Part of my thinking is that working direct with specialists would mean a better job all round, and hopefully a better guarantee for work etc.
Is this "self build"?