• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Why is Badenough not speaking the truth?

Status
Not open for further replies.
But the white ones ? Can’t play the race card ?
Or the discrimination card ?

Plod don’t have to consider any of the above when looking into or investigating the white ones
Have a watch of the film Spotlight. Its about an investigative news team that broke the story about the Catholic churches abuses in the US. There is a huge amount of soft power that "pillars of the community" can and will use to squash and minimise their crimes. If you don't think that will be a factor in taking forward an investigation you're fooling yourself.

Look at how Saville managed to stay out of court, or Epstein out of prison, or Rolf Harris for so long.

It's also an excellent movie, depressing in places but excellent.
 
Yeah the church


Nonsense to the above

Best you stop defending certain groups

Yes exactly
Exactly, I am not defending any groups, I'm just pointing out its not just 1 group type.

Why are so many just focussed on 1 group and letting the others off ?

The church isn't a race card player, but I don't think they are being investigated like they maybe should have been, or should be. hasn't somebody just resigned over these issues?

Its not the race card that needs playing, it's the sex offences card, and that doesn't respect race at all. As is constantly pointed out to you and others who always try and deflect from it and bring it back to the race card.

Shame on you, and the others like you
 
If the number of people charged is roughly in line with Ethnic population, as the data seems to show, then we have at least two obvious possibilities.

Either the Police charge people roughly equally.

Or that some ethnicities are carrying out the majority of group based sexual abuse but the police are charging them less, but by just the right amount to make it look roughly equal.

Now you could try to dig into either possibility to prove or disprove it. Or you can latch onto whichever you prefer. The usual suspects who hate Muslims have done the latter.
No what’s happening is the usual forum idiots are trying to stir up the hatred by implying child sex offenders are over represented by white british men.

The fact they seem too stupid or dishonest to accept is the data doesn’t show anything of the sort and if you read all of the posted reports you see the issues with the data quality as well as pockets of under reporting.
 
So the question was "why is badenough not speaking the truth"

And despite posting bucketloads of tripe, @motorbiking cannot face up to answering the question.

He won't even say if he thinks her false claims are true.

Which they aren't.
 
So the question was "why is badenough not speaking the truth"

And despite posting bucketloads of tripe, @motorbiking cannot face up to answering the question.

He won't even say if he thinks her false claims are true.

Which they aren't.
I’m not interested in your silly agenda spread over 5 pointless posts.
I will however correct the forum idiots who falsely want to pretend that child sex abuse gangs are over represented among white british men. It’s nonsense.

How do you feel about Trump being the one to get a Gaza peace deal? Must sting a bit?
 
I’m not interested in your silly agenda

You're certainly obsessed with avoiding the subject of this thread.

Read the title again.

And yet you tip irrelevant diversions onto it by the dozen. You can't keep away.

It must be worrying you.
 
You're certainly obsessed with avoiding the subject of this thread.

Read the title again.

And yet you tip irrelevant diversions onto it by the dozen. You can't keep away.

It must be worrying you.
Your nonsense ? Jeez I’d be busy if I corrected every post you made. I preferred it when you made posters.

Why did you stop?
 
No what’s happening is the usual forum idiots are trying to stir up the hatred by implying child sex offenders are over represented by white british men.

The fact they seem too stupid or dishonest to accept is the data doesn’t show anything of the sort and if you read all of the posted reports you see the issues with the data quality as well as pockets of under reporting.
Are they? Because everything I've seen is people saying that it's broadly equal. The other usual idiots who have been crowing about how many times they've been banned for racism have however absolutely been arguing that about Muslims, or Asians, or peasants.

The data quality is crap, but what we have does not support either that Asian gangs are the biggest source of gang abuse, or that Asians are more likely to be abusers.
 
Have a watch of the film Spotlight. Its about an investigative news team that broke the story about the Catholic churches abuses in the US. There is a huge amount of soft power that "pillars of the community" can and will use to squash and minimise their crimes. If you don't think that will be a factor in taking forward an investigation you're fooling yourself.

Look at how Saville managed to stay out of court, or Epstein out of prison, or Rolf Harris for so long.

It's also an excellent movie, depressing in places but excellent.

Nah
 
Exactly, I am not defending any groups, I'm just pointing out its not just 1 group type.

Why are so many just focussed on 1 group and letting the others off ?

The church isn't a race card player, but I don't think they are being investigated like they maybe should have been, or should be. hasn't somebody just resigned over these issues?

Its not the race card that needs playing, it's the sex offences card, and that doesn't respect race at all. As is constantly pointed out to you and others who always try and deflect from it and bring it back to the race card.

Shame on you, and the others like you

Nonsense tis you and others who play the race card

Some fruit cake in here yesterday played it

Because I asked if he was Chinese

:giggle:
 
It’s saying it’s really hard to make a link to ethnicity. This drives a hole though your it’s a white british male problem argument.
No, it really doesn't.
Didn’t read section 3.3.3. Obviously.
I have read it.
What do you think the last paragraph says?
3.3.3 Ethnicity Children on child protection plans under the primary category of sexual abuse on 31 March 2023 were more likely to be from White (White British or ‘White other’) backgrounds than the population of children attending English state schools and nurseries, or than the children placed on child protection plans for other reasons (see Figure 7). While 13% of children attending state schools and nurseries were from Asian backgrounds, only 8% of children placed on child protection plans because of sexual abuse were Asian; similarly, Black children made up 6% of the state school and nursery population but 3% of children placed on child protection plans because of sexual abuse. Research has highlighted the difficulties that professionals face in identifying sexual abuse and acting on concerns about children from minority ethnic backgrounds (Ali et al, 2021; Rodger et al, 2020), while also concluding that the likelihood of being sexually abused does not vary significantly between ethnic groups (Bebbington et al, 2011). Figure 6. Children on child protection plans and children in need at 31 March 2022, by sex, England

It talks about the children (victims of abuse)...??? :confused:

Still baffled. I wonder if Old Dementia can clear this up?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top