Gotcha. No, the ****** bit is definitely a hoax.I've not seen itWhich bit?Is the photo in your profile a hoax?
The bit with the bloke wearing a cap who really does look like a ******.
Try the mirror.
No hoax. Its the real thing.
Gotcha. No, the ****** bit is definitely a hoax.I've not seen itWhich bit?Is the photo in your profile a hoax?
The bit with the bloke wearing a cap who really does look like a ******.
Try the mirror.
Why did you ask then?No hoax. Its the real thing.
Clearly.To see if you have any cop on. Clearly you don't.
The photo is a hoax you ******.
Will do, thanks.Your Doctor put you on your medication for a good reason, please get back to taking it. Especially the one that states, "Take two three times a day to reduce verbal diarrhoea."
Will do, thanks.Your Doctor put you on your medication for a good reason, please get back to taking it. Especially the one that states, "Take two three times a day to reduce verbal diarrhoea."
Shameful stuff. I dare say reindeer and his cronies will soon shift into "apologist" mode.
Not apologist mode, denial mode.
I have no idea what an apologist is.The apologists/deniers have been very clever, and should have been politicians.
I have merely pointed out that (as usual) the lop sided view that Muslims are the only offenders on the planet. As started in the thread by No-brainsnorcon and corroborated by his idiot sidekick Handywank by posting hoax photos.Certainly throughout the last couple of pages, they have managed to divert interest away from the matter in hand by encouraging argument and name-calling.
Oh, you mean when Nobrainsnorcon decided to have a go at my profile picture or when he diverted the the original topic (as usual) onto Muslims? Or perhaps when Handywank had his dig?Certainly throughout the last couple of pages, they have managed to divert interest away from the matter in hand by encouraging argument and name-calling.
I detest and deplore all child abusers equally, including our home grown white ones which the right wing ******* are surprisingly mute about.I have yet to hear them openly deny that 'certain cultures', even in this country, see marriage and sex with under-age girls as quite acceptable.
Can you explain this paragraph please and how it fits in with recent posts? You can quote any of my posts in your explanation if you like.Ah, but that is equally 'clever' by implying that not stating the obvious means that they find it acceptable.
Oh look, another reference to muslims, what a surprise! Can you explain/justify this paragraph please? Feel free to quote me any time in your explanation.Much like anyone stating that most muslims are just ordinary people implies the same.
It's worse than bad, it is evil. Not all child abusers are Muslim. Does anyone agree?Ok. PAEDOPHILIA IS BAD. Does anyone disagree?
Plonker's quoting google again.Indeed.
Google wrote.....
"Due to its many endorsements within Islamic scripture, child marriages are permitted by the majority of Muslim scholars and leaders, and in many Islamic countries it is common practice.
Girls far below the age of puberty are forcibly married to older persons (sometimes in their 50s and later) for various personal gains by the girls' guardian or with the intention to preserve family honor by helping her avoid pre-marital sex."
Islam permits paedophilia and child rapists.
It certainly is shameful when some posters try to deceive others with fake images and imaginary quotes from google.Shameful stuff. I dare say reindeer and his cronies will soon shift into "apologist" mode.