Are you racist?Are you Jewish?
Are you racist?Are you Jewish?
This would suggest to me that the other ships didn't only comply after seeing what happened to the Mavi like you suggested.
1. it actually says nothing of the sort, you are just supposing it does, as you've 'suggested' here...
2. where is the 'undisputed' claim - I've showed you dissenting versions, so how is this article 'undisputed'?
When you've found that 'original' article that states that all parties agree on the timeline, then I'll retract...
Until then (and it won't happen) stop spouting bullsh*t...
Are you racist?Are you Jewish?
the wyse unit i'm on doesn't do Web history longer than a day.
What the link I posted does show is that the mavi wasn't the reason the other ships gave up without fighting back like you claimed. As at the least it states the mavi wasn't boarded first like you were suggesting.
You seem to be getting a bit desperate
That could be debateable...
NOYFB...(you could of said the same.. )Are you Jewish?
the wyse unit i'm on doesn't do Web history longer than a day.
What the link I posted does show is that the mavi wasn't the reason the other ships gave up without fighting back like you claimed. As at the least it states the mavi wasn't boarded first like you were suggesting.
You seem to be getting a bit desperate
Me getting desperate? Does one desperately sought after article mean it's 'undisputed' when it says nothing of the sort? (why the vancouver sun, you must have been googling for ages )
In this thread you made the following comment...
"And lastly, no, the other ships were taken first."
On Wed Jun 02, 2010 at 12:09 pm !
you then went on to say. "..and no, it is not being disputed by either side that the troubles only started on the last ship to be boarded."
On Wed Jun 02, 2010 12:30 pm
This was accusation I've pulled you up on, and you are squealing like a stuck pig - it was less than 4 hours ago you idiot, so there's plenty of time left to browse your history...
Oh, but of course you'll now say you saw this phantom link some time earlier...
keep digging that hole, because you are looking more stupid with every post you make...
I typed it 4 hours ago does that mean I have to have read it as I typed it??? I read about it before i started this thread...the article was one of the reasons I started the thread.
You can guess all you like - but then as I said, it's NOYFBI guess you must be. Why else would you be getting all upset over a forum post?
Did I ask your opinion?You are getting upset so it's obviously something personal to you. Why bother? You aint gonna change his mind or he yours.
But you're obviously no good at sarcasm...Thanks for the complement. He said I'm good at something.
Yeah, yeah - heard that all before If it ever existed, why didn't you post it since it was apparently a critical point according to you? But It won't have been removed so soon, so may I suggest you look through your browser history since if you've seen it online, it will be there...I am desperately seeking the news article that said about the order of ships, but that doesn't seem to be the focus in the articles anymore.
Do you really need to ask?Aside from that comment what else is it that you don't believe?
But then do you know what the Israeli's are probably doing right now?
They have the ships out of view, and have imprisoned the people who were on board.
Before they've started to let them go, they will have been confiscating/destroying every camera card, film footage, phone, and any video/audio evidence. They'll be removing any incriminating evidence, and maybe planting a few items...Then they'll invite a very limited investigation into the matter, which will give a vague conclusion, and the murderers will get away with it again..
A bit like what the Met does/tries to do really....