The shame is, that it is so easy for prejudice to be generated. My mother blew her top at me when I bought my first Toyota MR2. She still regards the Japanese as the scum of the earth, because of the attrocities handed out by some of them during WW2.
If we keep refering to Hamas, and Al-q'aida as "Islamic Extremists" it can only propogate the same sort of prejudice towards all Moslems. Which I fear has already happened. I know several people that consider "Islamic" means terrorist.
No way do I condone Osama and his lot. But while the West are seen to be complicit in the abuse of Arabs, he will have no shortage of volunteers.
Looking at the similarities of the three religions. First there was Judaism, founded by Moses. A fellow that was taken in by a well to do family, well educated and given considerable privelidge. Then he turns around and uses all this to lead a full scale revolt against the very people that had raised him! Typical rebelious teenager eh? Hence the birth of Judaism.
Then along comes Jesus and decides that the he doesn't like the elitist attitudes of Judaism and decides to include other races in the game. He is promptly ostracised and up pops Christianity. (and I thought I had problems with my teenage kids).
Then along comes Mohammed and decides it's all gone woefully wrong, because people have stopped listening. So he reminds the world of the words of all the other prophets, and hey presto Islam enters the fray.
So you have Judaism (if you're not a jew, your can't be in our club).
Christianity. (We take all commers, you can join our club if you want)
Islam (You can join our club, but if you belong to one of the others we accept that too).
As you may have gathered, I am a complete aetheist and believe in a doctrine of Live and Let Live. Personally, I think, if god wanted us to behave, he'd tell us. Why just secretly give one poor s*d the job of telling everyone else in the world and then make it realy difficult for him by going into hiding?
I know it is a common saying, but I don't agree with it. A "Freedom Fighter" enacts force against the state. A "terrorist" carries out threats or acts of violence against the public
So what about Israeli Soldiers shooting innocent civilians? Since they are perpetrating this against the public I suppose they should be branded "Zionistic Extremists"
I think the best chance we had of peace in the middle east was blown when Yitzhak Rabin was assasinated (by Israelis!) and then the newly elected Shimon Peres promptly disshonoured all the agreaments signed by his predecessor.
Our "special relationship" with the USA, was also one of the prime causes of the current troubles. Back in the late 1940s while Palestine was a
British Mandate, The Jews were offered one thing by the Brits, and another by the Americans (even though it was none of their business). Rather than upset the Yanks, the British just pulled out and left them all to it. Had they not been undermined by the American administration of the time, a negotiated establishment of Israel would probably have been acheived.