Why do you think they are all so terrified by the idea of another vote?I have a feeling that quitters may well find their lies are about to come up and bite them in the bum
Why do you think they are all so terrified by the idea of another vote?I have a feeling that quitters may well find their lies are about to come up and bite them in the bum
Sheds,,,no one is terrified for goodness sake, believe it or not,Brexit or no brexit,life will go on!..Why do you think they are all so terrified by the idea of another vote?
Ah, there is that strange 'logic' again...
But you carry on believing in that 'most of the UK' fallacy if you like...
Why do you think they are all so terrified by the idea of another vote?
If you don't vote you don't count.
you are saying you think because 2 year olds cant vote, the system is flawed
Sammy said that those who don't vote, don't count.What you're suggesting is rubbish
Please provide a link to the quote so that we can understand the context.
Therefore the quoted post of ellal's was either an intentional misrepresentation of ellal's opinion, or an accidental misunderstanding of the context.
In one thread you complain about FPTP.
In another you show complete lack of understanding in regard to the electorate. It's pretty clear to most when someone says 'most of the UK' in reference to an electoral process it means the UK electorate.
There's a reason the entire UK population isn't lumped in with the electorate because some are too young or not eligible to vote.
If you don't vote you don't count. In other words the majority voted for brexit.
Of course an ideal inclusive system would encompass the views of those that lose the vote also.
Therefore, if those that don't vote, and can't vote, and those that lose the vote, don't count, the system is fundamentally flawed, and will only consider the opinion of a minority at any one time. Therefore it is a system of minority rule
Why do you think they are all so terrified by the idea of another vote?/QUOTE]
"angered" is probably a better word for the sentiment.
Sammy said that those who don't vote, don't count.
That is nonsense. It is one of the reasons why MPs are elected to represent their constituents not just the voters, but all of their constituents, including those that don't or can't vote. Imagine if each time we contacted our MP they asked, "did you vote for me? If not I can't/won't help you!" Or even worse, they say, "sorry you don't count!"
Hopefully parents will vote with their childrens' future in mind. Obviously this does not extend to some grandparents.
Of course an ideal inclusive system would encompass the views of those that lose the vote also.
Therefore, if those that don't vote, and can't vote, and those that lose the vote, don't count, the system is fundamentally flawed, and will only consider the opinion of a minority at any one time. Therefore it is a system of minority rule.
Quite the opposite impression is being given by all those vociferously opposed to a second vote. They may dress up their fear with ludicrous arguments which revolve around the idea that it is undemocratic to ask the voters what they think, because of course they dare not say that they don't want a second vote because they are kacking it.Sheds,,,no one is terrified for goodness sake
No I didn't.Why do you think they are all so terrified by the idea of another vote?
"angered" is probably a better word for the sentiment.