And less than 17.5M of those 46M voted to leave the EU.there were 46 million eligible voters.
i.e. 38% of the electorate.
Factor in those who were denied the vote and any claims to democratic legitimacy look even more flaky.
And less than 17.5M of those 46M voted to leave the EU.there were 46 million eligible voters.
Oh look, Mummy, it's a racist.Typical French
No I didn't.
Don't falsify quotes.
"angered" is probably a better word for the sentiment.
Why do you think they are all so terrified by the idea of another vote?
Have you learnt nothing?
I have learned that derogatory comments made against people because of where they were born, or now live, are racist.
I have also learned that people who try to deny that by banging on about "it can't be racism because the race is the same" must be racists themselves with a natural desire to see the word rendered invalid. But feel free to teach me again that you are one of those.
Oh.No one was doing that. It's clearly an error in quoting, the way it's written is a dead giveaway.
Not everybody has to read something for it to form an opinion of theirs.Where did you read that?
In other words, yes.So in other words, no.
What absolute nonsense you have learned.I have learned that derogatory comments made against people because of where they were born, or now live, are racist.
I have also learned that people who try to deny that by banging on about "it can't be racism because the race is the same" must be racists themselves with a natural desire to see the word rendered invalid. But feel free to teach me again that you are one of those.
The thing about that question is that it ignores the fact that certainly since the times of the second two characters, and to a significant extent since the first, there have been a couple of very relevant introductions which affect the validity of the theory of evolution.
Education and dictionaries.
Once everybody is taught what existing words mean, and how they are spelled and used, and their meaning etc is documented, it becomes a lot harder to say that "wrong" is just "evolution", and much easier and valid to argue that if, for example, 'electrocute' is defined to mean a fatal electric shock then to start using it to mean a non-fatal one is simply wrong, and remains wrong no matter how many people are wrong.
In other words, yes.
Are you another racist who naturally wants to see the word fall into disuse?
Oh.
So your defence of Brigadier is that he is a lazy, incompetent {whatever} who simply CBA to do things properly?
Not everybody has to read something for it to form an opinion of theirs.
Some people are blessed with intelligence, and reasoning ability.