9/11 CONSPIRICY THEORY

The onus is on the authorities to prove it, but they can't, and they have access to ALL the evidence, unlike others.

If they did they could then dispell other theories - simple!

Not only is this wrong, as I have shown you evidence already, there is far more evidence on the internet to find to further back up what I have been saying. You however have shown zero evidence.

Also consider the following:
* Twoofers cannot even agree among themselves what happened, so your particular claim must be backed up with evidence to not only demonstrate that the conventional narrative is wrong, but other CTs are also wrong. This places an additional burden on you to provide evidence.

* What you are suggesting goes against what we know about Governments: That they are largely inefficient machines peopled by largely well meaning people, but the system is not capable of large scale conscious conspiracies. If some at the top are corrupt, this does not equate to any capability of huge conspiracies, infact the opposite is true.

* You say the authorities must provide "proof", well the authorities are unlikely to come here are they, so again it is up to you to provide evidence to back up your claims.

* Occams Razor dictates that as you are the one making extroadinary claims, it is up to you to provide the extraodinary evidence.

You believing in something does not make it real. You must back up your claims with evidence.

I won't hold my breathe.
 
Sponsored Links
You must back up your claims with evidence. I won't hold my breathe.

I wouldn't if I were you my friend, you have obviously missed all the recent documentaries on tv, or decided to dismiss them.

After all we still await the authorities who have access to all the information to come up with an uneqqivical response. Whoops , we are now going around in circles!!!!!!!!!! :LOL:
 
You must back up your claims with evidence. I won't hold my breathe.

I wouldn't if I were you my friend, you have obviously missed all the recent documentaries on tv, or decided to dismiss them.

After all we still await the authorities who have access to all the information to come up with an uneqqivical response. Whoops , we are now going around in circles!!!!!!!!!! :LOL:
Why am I not suprised you can't/won't.
I saw the conspiracy programs btw. Nothing I didn't already know about. These are old claims, long since debunked.

And this still requires you to provide evidence to back up your claims.

Still trying to deflect your lack of a credible theory by attacking the authorities I see.

I'll even help you out:
Try Googling the NIST report, or go for a lighter read, and look up Popular Mechanics. This is just for starters of course.

But still the onus is on to provide evidence.
 
the onus is on to provide evidence.

I'm happy with the version of events that non government sponsored experts have provided, that the authorities cannot dispell. I'm getting dizzy now!!

But I will personally ask to see all the stored debris and files when I go to New York next year. I am sure the authorities will not mind me scrutinising and analysing it. :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
 
Sponsored Links
I'm happy with the version of events that non government sponsored experts have provided, that the authorities cannot dispell.
That you are happy with them is irrelevant. You have provided zero evidence to support your claims, and the onus is on you to provide them here.
 
I'm happy with the version of events that non government sponsored experts have provided, that the authorities cannot dispell.

But I will personally ask to see all the stored debris and files when I go to New York next year. I am sure the authorities will not mind me scrutinising and analysing it.
That you are happy with them is irrelevant. You have provided zero evidence to support your claims, and the onus is on you to provide them here.

As previously said:

I will personally ask to see all the stored debris and files when I go to New York next year. I am sure the authorities will not mind me scrutinising and analysing it. :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ&feature=youtu.be


Bit of a boring video but the opinion of 1600 people with far more idea of these buildings than any of us.


Here is a wee thought for those of you who believe a plane or terrosist incident could bring these buildings down.

Following the 93 bombing which was carried out in the basement and was aimed at a particular section of the building.

Say someone in authority believed such an attack could bring these buildings down.
Now these buildings were roughly a quarter of a mile high.
If a bomb in a corner of the buildin either in basement or elsewhere in the building could cause the building to collapse what sort of devestation economical and life wise would a quarter of a mile building toppling sidewards cause.
Far far more than the 3000 that died and billions and billions of damage.

So someone gives the authority for the building to be secretly rigged for a controlled explosion so they come down in there own footprint as what happened on that day.

So planes hit and someone panics and thinks builings will topple do you kill 3000 OR believe if they topple it will kill 10000 plus and hits the button .

Feasible ??
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ&feature=youtu.be


Bit of a boring video but the opinion of 1600 people with far more idea of these buildings than any of us.


Here is a wee thought for those of you who believe a plane or terrosist incident could bring these buildings down.

Following the 93 bombing which was carried out in the basement and was aimed at a particular section of the building.

Say someone in authority believed such an attack could bring these buildings down.
Now these buildings were roughly a quarter of a mile high.
If a bomb in a corner of the buildin either in basement or elsewhere in the building could cause the building to collapse what sort of devestation economical and life wise would a quarter of a mile building toppling sidewards cause.
Far far more than the 3000 that died and billions and billions of damage.

So someone gives the authority for the building to be secretly rigged for a controlled explosion so they come down in there own footprint as what happened on that day.

So planes hit and someone panics and thinks builings will topple do you kill 3000 OR believe if they topple it will kill 10000 plus and hits the button .

Feasible ??
No.
First off, I can't see youtube at the moment.

But anyway, explosives have a shelf life:
"For example some shelf lives are follows:
Maximum period
Delay electric detonators 2½ years
Detonating cord 4 years
Emulsion explosives 12 months"
http://material.eng.usm.my/stafhome/termizi/EBS419E Blasting Tech/A_EXPLOSIVES.pdf

Also, you ignore the fact that:
* There was structural deformation prior to collapse (something you would never see with a CD).
* The buildings did not fall into their footprint, and infact destroyed a number of building nearby (WTC7 was damaged and collapsed due to fire, WTC3 was destroyed), and:
"The U.S. Customs House (6 World Trade Center), 4 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, and both pedestrian bridges connecting buildings were severely damaged. The Deutsche Bank Building on 130 Liberty Street was partially damaged and demolished later.[68][69] The two buildings of the World Financial Center also suffered damage.[68]

The Deutsche Bank Building across Liberty Street from the World Trade Center complex was later condemned as uninhabitable because of toxic conditions inside the office tower, and was deconstructed.[70][71] The Borough of Manhattan Community College's Fiterman Hall at 30 West Broadway was condemned due to extensive damage in the attacks, and is being rebuilt.[72] Other neighboring buildings including 90 West Street and the Verizon Building suffered major damage but have been restored.[73] World Financial Center buildings, One Liberty Plaza, the Millenium Hilton, and 90 Church Street had moderate damage and have since been restored."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks

And when WTC7 collapsed, it left debris on top of other neighbouring buildings. Hardly a controlled situation.

* The collapse began where the fire was raging. It is inconceivable that explosives and their fuse wires could survive an impact and the subsequent fire, and go un-noticed.

* The planting of any explosives in such a building would not go un-noticed, as it was occupied (as I have already shown). Not a single person has come forward to say they saw any such activity.
 
What has shelf life of explosives got to do with it the trade centre was regularly closed and was so approx a month before hand so it could have been a rolling programme.

And unless you are an explosives expert and would know exactly the type that would be used there is no point quoting sites that suit your ideas.

As for the list of buildings you give these are all basically within the footprint of the trade centres and some where actually attached to them so yes they would be damage but they would probably be evacuted too.
my point is far more would have been damaged if the buildings had toppled in opposite directions you would then have up to half a mile of death and destruction.

I will wait for your thoughts on the youtube link
 
It seem no matter what "proof" everyone throws at eachother. You never believe it.

Rather typical.................
 
(WTC7 was damaged and collapsed due to fire

Of course it was :rolleyes:

No other steel framed building has ever collapsed due to a fire, WTC7 was the first in the world to do so?
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ&feature=youtu.be


Bit of a boring video but the opinion of 1600 people with far more idea of these buildings than any of us.


Here is a wee thought for those of you who believe a plane or terrosist incident could bring these buildings down.

Following the 93 bombing which was carried out in the basement and was aimed at a particular section of the building.

Say someone in authority believed such an attack could bring these buildings down.
Now these buildings were roughly a quarter of a mile high.
If a bomb in a corner of the buildin either in basement or elsewhere in the building could cause the building to collapse what sort of devestation economical and life wise would a quarter of a mile building toppling sidewards cause.
Far far more than the 3000 that died and billions and billions of damage.

So someone gives the authority for the building to be secretly rigged for a controlled explosion so they come down in there own footprint as what happened on that day.

So planes hit and someone panics and thinks builings will topple do you kill 3000 OR believe if they topple it will kill 10000 plus and hits the button .

Feasible ??


But if you were going to do that you would not have let all those fire fighters enter the building and would allow as much time as possible for others to egress the building. Unless of course, you are American.
 
But anyway, explosives have a shelf life

Then why do the police shit themselves and the bomb disposal squads evacuate the area, every time somebody walks into the police station with an unexploded WW1 bomb? !!!!!!!!!
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top