Policy

[raebhoop]

I'm sure I woke up next to her after a night on the pop some years back...

 

[Blasphemous]

Having bible thumpers laugh at Lloyd Pye is just f*cking hysterical!!!!

Then convert us. Explain where the 'Terraformers' came from ie Who made them, how they came to be and why can't it be that they are in fact 'God'?

 

[ABCwarrior]

I'm not in the business of trying to convert people, I'll leave that to the worlds organised religions and their dogmas...

My point was that for anyone who believes in a "god"(whatever religion) based on faith and no evidence whatsoever, it's laughable to put down/slag off this mans research and where it's taken him, at least he has some tangible evidence not just some old book that's been re-written down the centuries, which in the case of christianity is a rip off of many older religions and paganism.

Take his last presentation on the Starchild DNA for example:- he has proven beyond any doubt through real scientific analysis that this skull discovered in Mexico has the mitochondrial DNA of a human(always the mother), but the nuclear DNA(shared by both mother and father) has only the human mothers part. The "father" part does not exist on any database of DNA currently known- not human, ape or anything else we know of in existence. The skull does not share any common shape or features of a normal human skull and the material it is made of is nothing like a normal human skull.

More than a little interesting....

 

[ABCwarrior]

I can't help laughing looking at that picture Raebhoop posted up though, looks probably what Nicola Sturgeon(Alex Salmonds deputy in the SNP) would look like wi no clothes on!!!!

 

[Blasphemous]

I'm not in the business of trying to convert people, I'll leave that to the worlds organised religions and their dogmas...

My point was that for anyone who believes in a "god"(whatever religion) based on faith and no evidence whatsoever, it's laughable to put down/slag off this mans research and where it's taken him, at least he has some tangible evidence not just some old book that's been re-written down the centuries, which in the case of christianity is a rip off of many older religions and paganism.

Take his last presentation on the Starchild DNA for example:- he has proven beyond any doubt through real scientific analysis that this skull discovered in Mexico has the mitochondrial DNA of a human(always the mother), but the nuclear DNA(shared by both mother and father) has only the human mothers part. The "father" part does not exist on any database of DNA currently known- not human, ape or anything else we know of in existence. The skull does not share any common shape or features of a normal human skull and the material it is made of is nothing like a normal human skull.

More than a little interesting....

Interesting indeed but does he explain who created the 'Terraformers'?

 

[pred]

God is great, he made the Earth he made the heavans, he made Adam & stEve & then on the 6th day he created LIGHT and behold it was GOOOD, why the hell didn't he turn the lights on first?? ffs! maybe he didn't want his competitors stealing his ideas.

And the big question "Who made god" or is that where the "blind faith" bit comes in.

 

[Blasphemous]

And the big question "Who made god"

The Terraformers perhaps?

 

[trollmaster2000]

And the big question "Who made god"

Allah.



or Santa Claus

 

[wobs]

So many fallacies with Pye, so little time:
http://www.theness.com/index.php/the-starchild-project/

Well, a DNA sample was taken from the skull, and was subjected to DNA probes designed to detect sequences of DNA that are unique to humans (performed by Dr. David Sweet, Director of the Bureau of Legal Dentistry at the University of British Columbia)5. The Starchild skull DNA was found to contain both an X and a Y chromosome. This is conclusive evidence that the child was not only human (and male), but both of his parents must have been human as well, for each must have contributed one of the human sex chromosomes.

 

[ABCwarrior]

Wobs, as you so keenly always say - what you're bringing to the table is nothing new(2006?), unlike the presentation I've watched from 2010/11, which utterly disproves this wrong analysis which was used by Steven Novella to try and discredit the work.

In 1999 the Starchild Skull was tested by the BOLD forensic teaching lab in Canada. They thought they had recovered human nuclear DNA from the "Y" chromosome, proving that the Starchild was a normal human male. This result was later determined to be a contamination.

In 2003 the Starchild Project was able to arrange another DNA test, this time by Trace Genetics, the ancient DNA lab that had tested the Kennewick Man. They were able to recover mitochondrial DNA, but not nuclear DNA. This left two options--either the nuclear DNA was too degraded to recover, or the DNA was too different from that of a human to be detected by the human primers they were using to test it

In 2006 a new "non specific" method of analysing DNA was discovered, and it took until 2010 to make this further analysis happen purely down to the costs involved...

454 Life Sciences Technology:
In 2006, a company called 454 Life Sciences of Branford, Connecticut, announced they had developed a new DNA analysis methodology that enabled sequencing of any unknown DNA sample without prior knowledge of any of its sequences. The only requirement was that the sample to be sequenced had to actually be DNA (in a chemical sense).

The 454 technique was also based on using primers, but these primers were standardized for every imaginable analysis, not specific to the DNA to be analyzed. It was exactly what was needed to recover and sequence the Starchild’s elusive nuclear DNA.

But then Occams blunt Razor means it must be hydrocephalus as Novella claims eh?
Even though the bone composition which has recently been analysed shows totally different makeup from normal human bone- half as thick, half the density yet much much stronger....never mind what the DNA is saying!

The up to date stuff is here though, if you can be bothered...

http://www.starchildproject.com/

And a good article on Wikipedia here shows exactly why Occams Razor is the favoured method of the mainstream blinkered majority.

http://www.starchildproject.com/wikipedia.htm



[/quote]

 

[joe-90]

Even though the bone composition which has recently been analysed shows totally different makeup from normal human bone- half as thick, half the density yet much much stronger..

What's it made of then? If it's not bone - then what is it? Do tell.

 

[ABCwarrior]

Space bone...obviously

 

[joe-90]

Which consists of what? Calcium? If not - then what.

 

[cantaloup63]

kryptonite

 

[joe-90]

Red or Green?