I've done it before but can't remember how,help anyone?
Bullfight called Off
- Thread starter Micilin
- Start date
I've done it before but can't remember how,help anyone?
Just press the messages tab on the top of the screen.
B
Big Tone
Got it thanks...
But, you don't have to be a friend to exchange messages. Or have things changed 
If someone has a private profile you have to make a friends requests pm them
Not true.
Or certainly never used to be. It depends on the receivers message settings.
You might be right, I don't let t**t pm me
I am right, and as you know I've got no friends.
AJ send me a message as a test.
Just helping out where I can.
R
RogueHanger
Yet you selectively choose to rank Halal slaughter, alone, with bull fighting.
What about all the other methods of killing animals, animals killed while hunting, on farms, slaughtered for other religions, put down for humane reasons, fishing, etc, etc.
You chose Halal slaughter only because it suited your agenda of islamaphobia.
This is where your prejudice shows through. You select Halal slaughter simply as ammunition to crticise Islam.
A quote from the web site that you linked to. Obviously you haven't read all of it, or you don't fully embrace the campaign, or you are just exploiting the campaign for your own biased aganda.
Fo instance:
The 2011 Foods Standards Agency animal welfare survey in Great Britain found that in September 2011
16% of Halal cattle slaughter was not pre-stunned; 1% was post-cut stunned
12% of Halal poultry slaughter was not pre-stunned; none was post-cut stunned
19% of Halal sheep/goat slaughter was not pre-stunned; 1% was post-cut stunned
100% of Shechita slaughter of cattle, poultry and sheep/goats was not pre-stunned; 10% of cattle was post-cut stunned.
You noticably fail to criticise Shechita methods of slaughter.
Can we assume, then, that in future,you will concentrate your opinions on the criticism of slaughter methods, and not exploit any and every opportunity to criticise Islam?
Moreover, when the non-stunned methods are no longer allowed, can we assume that you religious and racial intolerance will dissipate?
Your debating skills have illustrated time and time again that you routinely exploit opportunities to try to ferment religious and racial intolerance.You can get together with coathanger and use all the stats and diversionary tactics you want.It won't change the facts and research from the leading organisations in this field. You can criticise my debating skills all you wantbut if you can't successfully argue or prove that all of these organisations are wrong, then your criticism is meaningless.
This is just another example of your attempts to repeat those exploits.
Hence your repetitive referral to backward religions, instead of concentrating on the real meat of the issue (s'cuse the pun
)I could very easily go back a few posts and reproduce your vitriolic racially abusive comments to disprove your claim that you are only concerned with animal welfare. That, Whitespirit, is disingenuous.
But what else are we to expect from an abuser?
How many thanks did you get for your disingenuous post?
R
RogueHanger
Simple. Those simpletons are abusive bullies and by engaging with them it isn't long before they demonstrate their simple, biased and abusive attitudes for all the world to read.
Additionally, I think it's important for all the world to realise that there aren't only simple, abusive bullies populating UK, or GD forum.
Similar threads
- blightymam
- General Discussion
