Public Apology No. 2 Talking to Animals.

Sponsored Links
It seems like I may owe LMB (and others) an apology for taking the proverbial in so far as the ability to talk to animals (and they talk to you).

Never heard you talk but for a Reindeer you can use a word-processor. Not a lot of what you say makes much sense...
 
It seems like I may owe LMB (and others) an apology for taking the proverbial in so far as the ability to talk to animals (and they talk to you).

Never heard you talk but for a Reindeer you can use a word-processor. Not a lot of what you say makes much sense...
That's wierd. You seem to be eager to respond to my every word.
So there must be some substance in what I say, for you to find so much to disagree.
 
So there must be some substance in what I say, for you to find so much to disagree.

Did I say I disagreed with you (this topic) I think I said, "Not a lot of what you say makes much sense." :mrgreen:
 
Sponsored Links
I talk to my dog all the time, she understands me too.
Far better than the wife does.
The wife is not so keen on having her tummy tickled. :)
 
:LOL: :LOL: :LOL:

I never said anything about dogs holding conversations, let alone those tosspot cat-shaped vermin.

Fish recognize certain people though, and they have a rudimentary concept of time. FACT.
 
Zig Ziglar - there's a blast from the past.

In a former "career", we had a guy working for us who carried Zig Ziglar's "Closing the Sale" book with him at all times. Must have been 500 pages.
I doubt anyone stayed around long enough to have their sale closed :mrgreen:
 
So there must be some substance in what I say, for you to find so much to disagree.

Did I say I disagreed with you (this topic) I think I said, "Not a lot of what you say makes much sense." :mrgreen:
Do you not see that you're disproving your own asumption by hanging on my every word?

Kettles and pots spring to mid here. :mrgreen:
The subtle difference is hamdyjack, I've never accused you of posting nothing of substance.
Quite the contrary, I've often accused you of posting substantive racially offensive comments, worthy of a riposte.
So I'm willing, content and ready to respond to your substantive racially offensive posts, and your baseless accusatory comments, and your childish attempts at belittling others.
Whereas every time you accuse me of saying little of any sense, or any other derisory adjectives you can think of, and then respond to my comments, you are immediately disproving your own assesment.

So there's no change there, then. :LOL:
 
So there must be some substance in what I say, for you to find so much to disagree.

Did I say I disagreed with you (this topic) I think I said, "Not a lot of what you say makes much sense." :mrgreen:
Do you not see that you're disproving your own asumption by hanging on my every word?

Kettles and pots spring to mid here. :mrgreen:
The subtle difference is hamdyjack, I've never accused you of posting nothing of substance.
Quite the contrary, I've often accused you of posting substantive racially offensive comments, worthy of a riposte.
So I'm willing, content and ready to respond to your substantive racially offensive posts, and your baseless accusatory comments, and your childish attempts at belittling others.
Whereas every time you accuse me of saying little of any sense, or any other derisory adjectives you can think of, and then respond to my comments, you are immediately disproving your own assesment.

So there's no change there, then. :LOL:

That dictionary and thesaurus of yours must be looking pretty rag eared by now.

At least I am honest in my opinions, you can only post from the moral high ground because you are a coward afraid to say what you really believe.

You make unfounded claims, abuse is in almost every reply you make, you seem to think the ROP is when all of the evidence suggests/proves otherwise.

Can you give me a few examples of Islamic tolerance, if you can I bet there are 10 to 1 showing they are not.

:LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top