Essential reading for anyone concerned about freedom of speech and Islamophobia.

[transam]

Carry's the death penalty in some countries 7 I think ?

several videos on the net of gays in African countries being lynched & burnt for being gay

 

[EFLImpudence]

It's very surprising but as late as the 1960's, male homosexuality was illegal in the UK.

Did you get caught?



Actually, I don't think there were many around then.
Never knew any at school or work.

It only seems very prevalent now because of the media.

 

[Himaginn]

It's very surprising but as late as the 1960's, male homosexuality was illegal in the UK.

Actually, I don't think there were many around then.
Never knew any at school or work.

Because it was illegal!
How many criminals voluntarily identify themselves?
Your lack of sagacity speaks volumes.

 

[sooey]

It wasn't a screenshot, it was a quote using the normal 'quote' function.
It was your use of homophobic terms which was homophobic then and still is.

It was a screenshot last week when you posted it in that other deleted thread along with two others, all from 4 years ago. Do you deny that?

Moreover your intended usage of the word, by running the two words together, makes it evident that you were aware of the autocensorship facility in DIYnot and you intentionally bypassed it.

queer! queer! queer! There's nowt as queer as folk. Whoever penned that must have had you in mind.
No need to bypass the autocensorship function to type in a perfectly normal every day word like queer you idiot.
The rest of your waffle can't disguise the fact that you have just been exposed once again for the zealot that you are.
I write that there's something queer about you and you take it as a homophobic insult as I knew that you would. Because you can't help yourself, your purpose in life seems to be to prowl this forum and be offended.
You then screenshot it and triumphantly reproduce it over 4 years later as "proof" of my homophobia,
For the purpose of this discussion it's entirely irrelevant whether I am homophobic or not. What is relevant here is your total inability to see the other more everyday meaning in an ambiguous statement. You will always interpret such a statement sinisterly, which then leads you to accuse people of all kinds of isms which offend you.
You are a zealous idiot. You need too be banned again.

 

[noseall]

Actually, I don't think there were many around then.
Never knew any at school or work.

It only seems very prevalent now because of the media.

This IS a joke post, right?

 

[noseall]

Did you get caught?
.

Do homosexuals bother you EFLI?

 

[EFLImpudence]

Actually, I don't think there were many around then.
Never knew any at school or work.

It only seems very prevalent now because of the media.

This IS a joke post, right?

Which part do you disagree with?

 

[EFLImpudence]

Did you get caught?
.

Do homosexuals bother you EFLI?

That seemed like something you would say.

Why do you ask that?

 

[Himaginn]

It wasn't a screenshot, it was a quote using the normal 'quote' function.
It was your use of homophobic terms which was homophobic then and still is.

It was a screenshot last week when you posted it in that other deleted thread along with two others, all from 4 years ago. Do you deny that?

How can I deny something that has now been deleted? Plonker.

For the purpose of this discussion it's entirely irrelevant whether I am homophobic or not.

Perhaps the journalist who covered the story of your uncle might be interested to see how the nephew has turned out.
Maybe she could do a story along the lines of the abused become the new abusers, only in this case it would be those who experience racism become the new racists. Except that you don't stop there, you go further.

You are a zealous idiot. You need too be banned again.

What will that prove? Ah, yes of course, it will prove that homophobes and racists are allowed to persistently spout their abusive messages of hatred and four-letter expletives for over ten years, while those objecting to that type of comment are repeatedly banned.
Fee speech is OK on GD forum as long as it's homophobic, racist, abusive or contains four-letter expletives? Eh? Anyone objecting to it will be banned? Yeah, that'll work.

 

[EFLImpudence]

Do homosexuals bother you EFLI?

Occasionally, but it's understandable.

 

[noseall]

Which part do you disagree with?

WOT A DINOSAUR!

You are having a laugh? Are you seriously saying that the media have increased homosexual numbers?

 

[noseall]

Did you get caught?
.

Do homosexuals bother you EFLI?

That seemed like something you would say.

Why do you ask that?

Answer the question. Do homosexuals bother you?
Edit: you have. Ignore this post.

 

[EFLImpudence]

I have answered.

No - but there is a preponderance in the media which gives the impression that their numbers are greater than they are.

 

[noseall]

No - but there is a preponderance in the media which gives the impression that their numbers are greater than they are.

Eh?

 

[Himaginn]

I have answered.

No - but there is a preponderance in the media which gives the impression that their numbers are greater than they are.

That doesn't apply to terrorists attacks, or xenophobic attacks, or dog attacks, etc?