B
Brigade77
From the legendary Pat Condell.
***CAUTION***
NOT SAFE FOR MORONS
***CAUTION***
NOT SAFE FOR MORONS
Sponsored Links
Be fair. He refers to Quitters as Morons as well. Should you have watched it?
He also calls other people fools, imbeciles, selfish morons, dimwits, supercilious toerags, he says. He likes to insult people he disagrees with.
He even warns us against people like Buffoon and Rice-Pudd. Then he complains about "totally uncalled for insults and smears"
Yet he's complaining about people who he says are rude about him and his ilk.
He also disapproved of religion being taught to children.
Strange old feller.
Sad, angry, bitter old man.
Turn the sound off before you watch him.
He also calls other people fools, imbeciles, selfish morons, dimwits, supercilious toerags, he says. He likes to insult people he disagrees with.
He even warns us against people like Buffoon and Rice-Pudd. Then he complains about "totally uncalled for insults and smears"
Yet he's complaining about people who he says are rude about him and his ilk.
He also disapproved of religion being taught to children.
Strange old feller.
Sad, angry, bitter old man.
Turn the sound off before you watch him.
B
Brigade77
Holy ****, Batman.
Sponsored Links
Lets have a round of applause for Pat Condell.
He is spot on with his summing up.
Well spotted by Dork Lard.
Tim
He is spot on with his summing up.
Well spotted by Dork Lard.
Tim
Ah bless, the humour went over JohnDs head so he interpreted what was said literally in order to make a point.
An accurate summing up of remainers, so no wonder JohnD didnt like it.
I wonder why he made such as fuss about less-educated people tending more to Quitting and more-educated people tending more to Remain?
We all know it's true, we just don't usually mention it because Quitters get offended. It isn't even restricted to young people. It's true of more-educated and less-educated old people as well.
His delivery is quite poor. It doesn't seemed to have improved since "Chortle gave Condell's 2006 show a negative review, noting that Condell is covering familiar territory but "is not quite up to the job," and observing that Condell's material was delivered "with very little variation in pace or tone, ... with the feel of a lecture" and "no structure, no building up to a passionate, climactic conclusion, no ebb and flow of storytelling." Chortle concluded that "Condell is still going through the motions."
We all know it's true, we just don't usually mention it because Quitters get offended. It isn't even restricted to young people. It's true of more-educated and less-educated old people as well.
His delivery is quite poor. It doesn't seemed to have improved since "Chortle gave Condell's 2006 show a negative review, noting that Condell is covering familiar territory but "is not quite up to the job," and observing that Condell's material was delivered "with very little variation in pace or tone, ... with the feel of a lecture" and "no structure, no building up to a passionate, climactic conclusion, no ebb and flow of storytelling." Chortle concluded that "Condell is still going through the motions."
Watch it again John.
Its even better second time around
Tim
Its even better second time around
Tim
It does go on a bit, I couldnt watch it twice.
- Joined
- 7 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 13,078
- Reaction score
- 3,017
- Country
Not dull enough to have posted 30,000 plus times on here.
Just keen to help those in need, hate.
- Joined
- 7 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 13,078
- Reaction score
- 3,017
- Country
Was that post helpful Digger ?Just keen to help those in need, hate.
Sponsored Links
