Er, think again.
No need too. Just look at notch's posts. Just the same scaremongering hogwash over and over again.
To the point he actually believes it.
Er, think again.
reasoned list of Brexit benefits for example?
Replace the word 'true' with 'fact' and you’d be talking about Notchy.Keep repeating it, then it has to be true.
It will be easy to direct me then via a link if you dont want to list them again
We get to run our own affairs without a foreign power meddling. Its called independance.
We kick out all foreign owned fishing vessels from our waters.
Our fishing waters are a unique asset. And its ours to plunder.
Not some french frog sitting in paris.
Wealthy farmers get no subsidies saving the tax payer billions.
Every other business has to stand on its own feet why should farmers be any different?
We keep the foreigners out. No one tells us who we should take or not take.
We kick the foreigners using the nhs for free out.
The list is endless.
Hobbeled by a foreign power or run your own affairs?
The choice is simple.
Brexit wont get fishing back
no agreement on fishing right then no FTA with EU
no FTA with EU and if the UK then refuse to agree fishing rights with the EU, they will refuse to buy our fish...which is where most UK fish is exported.
I cant be bothered with the rest of the tripe.
If you think Brexit will get back independence you really are clueless.
Brexit wont get fishing back
no FTA with EU and if the UK then refuse to agree fishing rights with the EU, they will refuse to buy our fish...which is where most UK fish is exported
Then it isn't brexit.
Giving up our membership of the EU is Brexit
What did you think the results of Brexit were going to be?
Silly Ryler.
What did you think the results of Brexit were going to be?
If that's your definition of Brexit, that no foreign owned boats fish in our territorial waters, then you're going to be disappointed by Brexit. Even if we did leave the EU and banned the boats from other nations permission to fish here, which is pretty difficult when you dig into it, we don't have the number of boats to catch it all, we don't want the fish we'd be getting as they're mostly sold to the EU (who'd probably slap some big tarrifs on as retaliation), we'd lose access to the EU waters our five remaining fishermen use to catch fish we actually want. We definitely don't have enough naval boats to enforce it.No schitt,
Then it isn't brexit. The bloke asked for the benefits of brexit.
Can't be bothered with the rest of your usual hogwash.
If that's your definition of Brexit, that no foreign owned boats fish in our territorial waters, then you're going to be disappointed by Brexit. Even if we did leave the EU and banned the boats from other nations permission to fish here, which is pretty difficult when you dig into it, we don't have the number of boats to catch it all, we don't want the fish we'd be getting as they're mostly sold to the EU (who'd probably slap some big tarrifs on as retaliation), we'd lose access to the EU waters our five remaining fishermen use to catch fish we actually want. We definitely don't have enough naval boats to enforce it.
What could, but probably won't, happen after we leave the EU is we start charging Johnny foreigner more to fish our waters, which might meet your demands.