Tell that to the BBC then who are more than happy jump on random peaks recorded at an RAF base with acres of heatsink concrete and tarmac.A single peak of intense days heat, on its own, has little bearing on climate change data
Tell that to the BBC then who are more than happy jump on random peaks recorded at an RAF base with acres of heatsink concrete and tarmac.A single peak of intense days heat, on its own, has little bearing on climate change data
What bit don't you understand ?Tell that to the BBC then who are more than happy jump on random peaks recorded at an RAF base with acres of heatsink concrete and tarmac.
View attachment 341604
Tell that to the BBC
Who does ?
Not me - I welcome then as they are all supposed to be scientist aren't they - probably climate scientist im sure there are plenty of jobs for that waiting for them.
What bit don't you understand ?
You are missing my point - I am talking about how the media report it. ---Still absolutely fack all bearing on overall climate data.
What they are doing with their doom laden reporting is turning most people off the whole subject. Maybe they have to lay it on thick for people here because in this country they have a hard sell trying to tell people the climate is warming.No, this normal process, that would occur in an open, honest and free society doesn't seem to be possible. And so we have endless gaslighting instead. Which many of us see through and are not foold by. In fact, it absolutely undermines the alarmist narrative. It screams weakness, fear and dishonesty.
Maybe they have to lay it on thick for people here because in this country they have a hard sell trying to tell people the climate is warming.
The UK has always got excited about high summer temps, ever since I was a kid. Always made headlines news. What's you beef?You are missing my point - I am talking about how the media report it. ---
Err no:We aren't producing anywhere near the same amounts of CO2 that volcanic activity did a few thousand years ago...
We certainly aren't going to reduce our CO2 emissions by building wind turbines and solar panels (which always have to be backed up by gas or coal power stations) or by increasing tax on people who need to use cars!
Err no:
Timeline of volcanism on Earth - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
CO2 from volcanoes may have produced a comparable amount on a geological timescale, but not in the last few thousand years. Over 100s thousands of years, we can see the highest point was 300ppm:
Renewables pay their carbon footprint back with a number of months after starting operation typically. This along with nuclear etc. are essential, to decarbonise the grid.
Not as fast as it is now.The climate is always changing.
That was not a truly global change (but nearly). The effect was less pronounced than what we are seeing.faster than Younger Dryas event? I don't think so
Carbon dioxide levels steadily increased over the course of the Younger Dryas, from circa 210 ppm at its start to circa 275 ppm at its termination.[/quote]
Younger Dryas - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
what a dumb statementNot as fast as it is now.
Don't mention the younger Dryasfaster than Younger Dryas event? I don't think so
It’s been worse before. We make very little differenceNot as fast as it is now.