Trump defamation settlement (Ed.)

The judge refused to toss the case because the reporter stated that the jury found him guilty of rape. Had the reporter said that the judge had said that Trump raped E Jean, ABC would have been in the clear.
 
I am surprised that the mods let such libellous accusations stand on here -- oh - wait;) :LOL:
 
The judge refused to toss the case because the reporter stated that the jury found him guilty of rape. Had the reporter said that the judge had said that Trump raped E Jean, ABC would have been in the clear.
If thats right you, see that in libel cases over here, a very small difference in language can make all the difference in the outcome.
 
Yep like calling him a “convicted felon and rapist.”

When you know it’s a lie. It’s funny, there must be so many despicable acts to criticise Trump for, without making up lies about him.

The fact is, in the civil case the jury did not make a finding of rape, but since the case was a libel hearing, the judge commented that it was in effect close enough to support a finding of truth in the allegation to defend the the defamation.

Trump hasn’t even been tried for rape, so he cannot be found guilty of rape no matter what any judge or forum idiot says.
 
Criticising a convicted felon and rapist? I'd certainly hope so.
 
Back
Top