No. Leaders should put their nation first, which is what Trump says he is doing so you can’t blame him for that.Do you think other world leaders should do as Trump asks, even if it is wrong or bad for their host nation?
Last edited:
No. Leaders should put their nation first, which is what Trump says he is doing so you can’t blame him for that.Do you think other world leaders should do as Trump asks, even if it is wrong or bad for their host nation?
So the Panama Canal thing, Greenland? As long as it makes America better, it's OK to make other countries worse off, right?No. Leaders should put their nation first, which is what Trump says he is doing so you can’t blame him for that.

No.It's one thing being a supporter. Quite another to draft in 100 activists, flying them into US from UK. Wonder who paid for all that.
Wouldn't you now agree that it was incredibly stupid, short-sighted and undiplomatic for Labour ministers to criticise Trump and fight Biden's campaign - only for Trump to win? Now they will have to go begging for crumbs.
Don't know much about it other than the headlines and not really looked into it as TBH, I’m not that interested in it but I think whoever owns them now should continue to own them. What about the Falklands thing, Gibraltar etc? Do you think we should give them back? Hey, wasn’t America ours once? I'd like it back now please. Actually, no, I wouldn't!So the Panama Canal thing, Greenland? As long as it makes America better, it's OK to make other countries worse off, right?
No.And it's OK for one of your acolytes for example, to vindictively influence the politics and sow chaos in another nation, even if it DOESN'T necessarily make America great?
Trump is not putting his nation first.No. Leaders should put their nation first, which is what Trump says he is doing so you can’t blame him for that.
Maybe he isn't.Trump is not putting his nation first.
Trump cares only about himself
Trumps policies will make the lives of ordinary Americans worse
Biden and Harris put their nation first.

Mottie gets the DIYnot stating the bleeding obvious prize this week...Starmy picked a loser to assist.
I'm not sure how this fits with Trump being a megalomaniac bell end and his attempts at making America great again at all costs...?What about the Falklands thing, Gibraltar etc? Do you think we should give them back? Hey, wasn’t America ours once? I'd like it back now please. Actually, no, I wouldn't!
Well, it’s like Argentina and Spain wanting them. Do you think they should have them?I'm not sure how this fits with Trump being a megalomaniac bell end and his attempts at making America great again at all costs...?![]()

If Argentina, or anybody else said the Isle of wight was there's because of history, would you view it the same ?Well, it’s like Argentina and Spain wanting them. Do you think they should have them?
If Argentina or anybody else had been continuously, peacefully and effectively inhabited and administered it for a couple of hundred years, I’d view it exactly the same as the Falklands or Gibraltar.If Argentina, or anybody else said the Isle of wight was there's because of history, would you view it the same ?
I think not
No.
It's different to what you are trying to imply. It wasn't interfering
You said that there was interference.
You claimed the use of quotation marks shows that something is untrue.
The quotation marks are in the very headline that you quoted.
Therefore, your own source refutes your claim....
There was no interference: that's why your quoted source had the word in quotation marks,
Please don't twist things. You first inferred that because something was in quotation marks that it's not true that there was interference or it didn't happen. Remember??? Just before you threw in a juvenile insult to try to boost your non-argument. Please see below and refer back to your post number 46.![]()

Yes. Can you not see the difference?But I'm guessing you would say Musk is interfereing in UK/European politics.