Yes used that a bit, our lecturers at Uni would put all of our papers through a checking software to look for plagerism, a few got kicked off the course for this, they just used google and cut and pasted everything. Only time we could recite other peoples work was to reference them and it was frowned upon except in context.
Same here, hard to keep up with the cheaters though.
nutso.
"trusted authors", he sez, then spaffs a wad of unsubstantiated gubbins from random quacks ducking and diving around the actual evidence. You may as well quote Graham Hancock.
Didn't think to look into actual evidence, peer reviewed and accredited sources, either.
so you dont think it could have been the same people using their existing knowledge ?
except when it came to lab time. Funny how they struggled with the practical aspect during any lab work but then miraculously produced a piece of complex software a week later complete with a written paper that you could only believe a Professor or Dr could have writtten.
Would that be the hancock whose theories have so often debunked the so called main stream
Interest is not the same as academic research,..
Yes.
I really don't know what you're on about, sorry. It would just be simpler if you said what you actually believe.
i have told you what i believe it wasnt ancient egyptians that history speaks about
and that matters to you because ?
Suck it up
