UFO / UAP

Status
Not open for further replies.
Again, even mainstream archeologists are confused as to how they made that item being that is is perfectly symmetrical and extremely thin and fragile....
So, we have never found any Egyptians tools that can do the job?
 

Section 3.

What an incredible load of made up waffle. It's very obviously some first year student's thesis...

Why would any sane person, go to such trouble to make such an item, from stone, and to such a fine level of accuracy, simply to mash beer? It defies any belief. If such a shape of object were needed, then they had copper-smith technology, the ability to make such items from copper, and copper would work brilliantly. The only reason he could think of for not using copper, was that copper would be a similar colour to the mash, and not so easy to distinguish.



Come on, you can do better 0/10.
 
It's very obviously some first year student's thesis...

Take your pick.
 
What an incredible load of made up waffle. It's very obviously some first year student's thesis...

Why would any sane person, go to such trouble to make such an item, from stone, and to such a fine level of accuracy, simply to mash beer? It defies any belief. If such a shape of object were needed, then they had copper-smith technology, the ability to make such items from copper, and copper would work brilliantly. The only reason he could think of for not using copper, was that copper would be a similar colour to the mash, and not so easy to distinguish.



Come on, you can do better 0/10.
Take a look at the ship burial found at Sutton Hoo, as an example of how such finely crafted items could be consigned to the afterlife which they believed implicitly would await them. You have to think like an Egyptian, Harry...


...but in the name of all that's holy do not; under any circumstances, try to walk like one. :cool:
 
What an incredible load of made up waffle. It's very obviously some first year student's thesis...

Why would any sane person, go to such trouble to make such an item, from stone, and to such a fine level of accuracy, simply to mash beer? It defies any belief. If such a shape of object were needed, then they had copper-smith technology, the ability to make such items from copper, and copper would work brilliantly. The only reason he could think of for not using copper, was that copper would be a similar colour to the mash, and not so easy to distinguish.



Come on, you can do better 0/10.

It's by a professor.

Iff you'd read the article you'd see they think it was formed rather than milled.

Metal wasn't cheap. They typically used stone for those tools as the article explains.

Finally, it also disproves some of your accuracy claims as it points out that the object is lopsided.

This is emblematic of your problems, you don't check any of your assumptions and you don't dig deeper than superficial claims.
 
The fact of the matter is this. Nobody knows who built the Pyramids. It may have been the Egyptians but realistically it was a much more advanced civilisation than the egyptians. Everything including the archeologists are basing their beliefs on artifacts found and a few scrolls but these do not reveal how they built them or what for, it is all assumption. The more likely and more believable theory of aliens building them is a serious consideration.
 
Last edited:
Everything including the archeologists are basing their beliefs on artifacts found and a few scrolls but these do not reveal how they built them or what for, it is all assumption.
No, all confirmed by research. That's how science works.

There is absolutely zero evidence that anyone else did it.
 
No, all confirmed by research. That's how science works.

There is absolutely zero evidence that anyone else did it.
It isn't as simple and a closed door that research has discovered anything other than a theoretical assumpion based on filling in the gaps with their own ideas. Too many things don't add up to completely disregard other theories.
 
I disagree. It is a theory based on archeological evidence.

There is zero evidence for anything else
 
A theory, like I know I've got an idea but it could be wrong?

Screenshot_20250502-215101_Chrome.jpg
 
I disagree. It is a theory based on archeological evidence.
Yes I know what you are saying, because the Pyramids are in Egypt and a few artifacts have been found that date around the time of the pyramids then it must have been the Egyptians that built them. Sounds reasonable until you delve into the technology and tools that were available at the time of the Egyptians. Then you have to question the theories as they do not make any sense.
 
Sounds reasonable until you delve into the technology and tools that were available at the time of the Egyptians. Then you have to question the theories as they do not make any sense.
Not according to the experts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top