Indian / UK trade deal

[fillyboy]

Your several years out of date.



Hope this helps.

It refers to the period Regan was referring to and these were people who arrived BEFORE we left the EU.

Hope this helps himmy.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

It refers to the period Regan was referring to and these were people who arrived BEFORE we left the EU.

Bliar years ago claiming only a handful off EEs will come here when they gave them freedom of movement without the restrictions that other EU countries had in place? In reality, millions came.

The EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) was a UK government program designed to allow EU, EEA, and Swiss citizens, along with their family members, to apply for UK immigration status and continue living, working, and studying in the UK after the UK's exit from the European Union

It was only designed after Brexit, 21 years after Blair's decision to not enact the limit.
You know ell that that ReganandCarter was referring to the early years.
You should have gone to Specsavers.

A similar EU arrangement allowed 1.2 million Brits to remain in EU.
Do you think all those resettled people should have been repatriated?
The NHS, Care and Hospitality sectors would have collapsed.
But ReganandCarter would be happy because his prejudice would perceive it as an improvement.

Hope this helps

 

[blup]

The right wing are confused, on the one saying there would be no deal if it wasn’t for brexhit and on the other we’ve been shafted. Maybe there is truth somewhere in the middle I.e. we have been shafted by brexhit.

 

[fillyboy]

It was only designed after Brexit, 21 years after Blair's decision to not enact the limit.
You know ell that that ReganandCarter was referring to the early years.
You should have gone to Specsavers.

A similar EU arrangement allowed 1.2 million Brits to remain in EU.
Do you think all those resettled people should have been repatriated?
The NHS, Care and Hospitality sectors would have collapsed.
But ReganandCarter would be happy because his prejudice would perceive it as an improvement.

Hope this helps

**** off and troll someone else himmy.

 

[MNW67]

The right wing are confused, on the one saying there would be no deal if it wasn’t for brexhit and on the other we’ve been shafted.

I think they are trying to blame Starmer for failing to exploit the glorious opportunity that is Brexit.

 

[noseall]

I think they are trying to blame Starmer for failing to exploit the glorious opportunity that is Brexit.

I don't think f-boy is happy about his shítty Brexit though. Too many foreigners and all that.

 

[MNW67]

It was only designed after Brexit, 21 years after Blair's decision to not enact the limit.
You know ell that that ReganandCarter was referring to the early years.
You should have gone to Specsavers.

Isn't the real question how many extra came because of Blair's decision. Is that number quantifiable.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

**** off and troll someone else himmy.

I think I can safely call that a fillyboy respectful retreat.

 

[fillyboy]

Isn't the real question how many extra came because of Blair's decision. Is that number quantifiable.

See my link.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

Isn't the real question how many extra came because of Blair's decision. Is that number quantifiable.

What was the extension that was available that Blair could have invoked?
And how many extra came during that time and never went home?

In 2004 and 2005, 129,000 migrants from the A8 countries entered Britain, according to research by migration researcher John Salt that takes into account various ways of measuring immigration.

The huge political cost of Blair’s decision to allow Eastern European migrants unfettered access to Britain

In 2004 the Labour government allowed citizens of the 10 new EU states labour market access. Why did Blair make this decision?

theconversation.com

Millions according to ReganandCarter and fillyboy.

 

[MNW67]

What was the extension that was available that Blair could have invoked?

It looks like we could have delayed for 7 years and that roughly 100,000 came every year during that period.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

It looks like we could have delayed for 7 years and that roughly 100,000 came every year during that period.

In the early years, it was a little over 100,000 over two years.

In 2004 and 2005, 129,000 migrants from the A8 countries entered Britain,

Later years it was about 100,000 each year.

,with 112,000 A8 nationals entering the UK in 2007 alone.

The end of the 7 year hiatus would have ended in 2011.
So assuming your assumption to be correct, it would have menat that an additional 700,000 came to UK due to the decision in 2004.

And ReganandCarter and fillyboy thinks it was millions.

In addition:

At the time, Labour’s decision was largely uncontroversial and met with bipartisan support in parliament.

While Britain confirmed the decision in late 2002, most other member states did not make the decision until early 2004. The UK economy was booming at this time, leading to demand for workers.

The huge political cost of Blair’s decision to allow Eastern European migrants unfettered access to Britain

In 2004 the Labour government allowed citizens of the 10 new EU states labour market access. Why did Blair make this decision?

theconversation.com

 

[ReganAndCarter]

There aren't many who are eligible. Run of the mill Indian workers aren't, it's only for specific cases.

That's what the politicians say.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

That's what the politicians say.

Maybe you should vote for Guy Fawkes. He sounds like your kind of leader.

 

[fillyboy]

And ReganandCarter and fillyboy thinks it was millions.

And the UK Govt.