Versatile. Crowd pleasing. Closer ties to the EU.Starmer is clearly prioritising seeing off reform more than pleasing his own back benchers.
Nation of strangers and now U-turn on fuel.
What's not to like.
Keep up the good work Sir Keir.
Versatile. Crowd pleasing. Closer ties to the EU.Starmer is clearly prioritising seeing off reform more than pleasing his own back benchers.
Nation of strangers and now U-turn on fuel.
There is such a thing as moral expectation.expected? where is this written in law?
The UK contributes to the international foreign aid budget. The UK's official development assistance (ODA) is allocated to support developing countries, with a focus on specific regions like Africa and Asia. In 2024, the UK spent £14.1 billion on ODA,
His back benchers were selected because they were starmerites, it's the constituents that are the problem. Seeing off re form has to be a practical priority for the government. I'm surprised he doesn't go in much harder against Nige, like the MAGA's do to the dems.Starmer is clearly prioritising seeing off reform more than pleasing his own back benchers.
Nation of strangers and now U-turn on fuel.

not law then - thought soThere is such a thing as moral expectation.
But there are also Agreements in place:
![]()
Foreign Aid Agreements
"Foreign Aid Agreements" published on by Oxford University Press.opil.ouplaw.com
In addition the UK is a doner to the ODA, and cannot escape its commitments.
Agreements which may or may not be bound by, and enforceable with, legal constraints and jurisdictions.not law then - thought so

Are you suggesting the UK has no ability to cancel its foreign aid contracts?Agreements which may or may not be bound by, and enforceable with, legal constraints and jurisdictions.
Contracts?Are you suggesting the UK has no ability to cancel its foreign aid contracts?

Contracts?
Are you suggesting a treatie is a contract now?
Contracts?
Are you suggesting a treatie is a contract now?
Are you suggesting the UK has no ability to cancel its foreign aid contracts?
How odd, the UK government demands right to terminate/termination for convenience in pretty much all its commercial dealings.
I'm surprised that mbk doesn't know the difference.what the f** else is itif its legally binding.
What's the Difference?
Contracts and treaties are both legally binding agreements between parties, but they serve different purposes. Contracts are typically used in business transactions or personal agreements, outlining the terms and conditions of a specific exchange of goods or services. Treaties, on the other hand, are agreements between countries or sovereign states, often addressing issues of international relations, trade, or peace. While contracts are more focused on individual relationships and obligations, treaties have broader implications and can impact the relationships between nations on a larger scale.
He's (legally) out of his depth, as per.I'm surprised that mbk doesn't know the difference.
Are you suggesting a treatie is a commercial dealing?Are you suggesting the UK has no ability to cancel its foreign aid contracts?
How odd, the UK government demands right to terminate/termination for convenience in pretty much all its commercial dealings.
He could go back to his day job, teaching Dick Turpin how to sail (close to the wind).He's (legally) out of his depth, as per.
poor old Motorbiking is twisting himself inside out trying to find a negativeVersatile. Crowd pleasing. Closer ties to the EU.
What's not to like.
Keep up the good work Sir Keir.![]()
what messes?And created huge messes too
1.4 billion saved by cutting the winter fuel allowance, you say a few billion doesnt make a jot of a difference. So Starmer did it out of spite then?