Slashing the boats in shallow water, now

[aveatry]

Here is another one from the BBC

 

[Notch7]

Here is another one from the BBC

View attachment 386291

that image was used in a load of media outlets:

 

[aveatry]

that image was used in a load of media outlets:

View attachment 386293

You idiot it was from the very BBC link that YOU GAVE
Go on click it - its the landing picture for the link

Migrant crisis: The Channel beaches that host a lethal trade in human hope

The journeys migrants make across the Channel are book-ended with beaches that tell the story of the crisis.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[Notch7]

They are 100% from the BBC website

If you want to use them as evidence you need to show the link

By the way, the images you chose as examples have been widely used across loads of media

Here is an article from the BBC telling us exactly what I said

Doesn’t prove what you claimed.

You tried to claim every image the BBC shows has a woman or child in it…..your “evidence” is a few images you’ve selected to support your claim……I’d like to think you at least had the intelligence to realise that is not the evidence you need.

By the way around 17% of people arriving in small boats are women and children……which is almost 1 in 5 are you claiming the BBC are showing a different ratio?

 

[denso13]

Can you be sure about Notch? Himmy?

I think so, yes.

 

[aveatry]

You tried to claim every image the BBC shows has a woman or child in it

If you want to read that into it then that's up to you - you are either autistic and take things literally or you just like arguing.
Here is the chain of conversation. You are quite tedious 1000ppm

women and children to facilitate their illegal entry. Tells you what sort of people they are, but the liberals still believe they're poor, oppressed refugees fleeing for their lives. From France.

Well I suppose now then we will finally be seeing all the women and children arriving in the dinghies like the bbc keep telling us they contain.

 

[Notch7]

You idiot it was from the very BBC link that YOU GAVE
Go on click it - its the landing picture for the link

Oh dear, you are making yourself look very foolish.



The image was used across a load of media sites

The times
Guardian
Independent
Nytimes
Daily mail
Telegraph

Yet you have decided because the BBC used it, that proves just the BBC is biased. Aveatry is a clownshoe

 

[Notch7]

If you want to read that into it then that's up to you - you are either autistic and take things literally or you just like arguing.
Here is the chain of conversation. You are quite tedious 1000ppm

Do you believe the BBC shows a bias in its reporting which gives the impression there are more women and children arriving in small boats than is actually the case?

 

[Notch7]

You are quite tedious 1000ppm

Yes I caught you lying about that.

You tried claiming it would be beneficial for the world to have more co2 as it would increase agriculture yield
You then quoted as evidence an excerpt from a book about greenhouses.

You are a squirming little liar that’s been caught out.

 

[aveatry]

You tried claiming it would be beneficial for the world to have more co2 as it would increase agriculture yield

Nope lies again - I never made such a claim at all --notch making things up again and lying - oh well
You will of course be able to prove that I said what you claim

 

[Notch7]

Nope wrong again - I never made such a claim at all --notch making things up again - oh well
You will of course be able to prove that I said what you claim

Yes you did make that claim.

Here it is

You do know that we are dangerously close the earth to not have enough CO2 to sustain plant life.

The ambient level of CO2 in the atmosphere is approximately 400 PPM. At 100 PPM of CO2 the rate of photosynthesis would be stopped completely. At 150 PPM the plants begin to respire, and photosynthesis is stopped. At this low level the plant will no longer be able to obtain CO2 from the atmosphere and photosynthesis is restricted. The plant will eventually use all of the CO2 present, photosynthesis will stop and the plant will die.

The rate of photosynthesis at 350 PPM will be consistent with growing conditions outside of a controlled environment, given that ambient levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are approximately 400 PPM.

With no other limiting factors such as heat, light and nutrients the plants will photosynthesize at a rate consistent with ambient conditions (i.e. outside of the greenhouse). There may be a slight increase in photosynthetic efficiency due to the higher than ambient CO2 level, however this increase will probably be insignificant. The level of 1000 PPM CO2 is very close to the optimum level of CO2 required, given no other limiting factor, 1200 PPM, to allow a plant to photosynthesis at the maximum rate.

 

[aveatry]

Yes you did make that claim.
Here it is

I am afraid you wasted your time searching for something that does not say

it would be beneficial for the world to have more co2 as it would increase agriculture yield

You can not even troll properly.

 

[aveatry]

Anyway - notch yet again shows us that when he has lost an argument - BBC boat pictures that he then takes the thread off track. - Standard MO that everyone sees from you

 

[Justin Passing]

FFS it doesn't matter a toss whose picture it was as long as it's verified.
STFU the lot of you!
You lied. NO you lied. No but yes but you we were wrong first and you always lie. But you never admit you're wrong . Yes I do but I'm not....
But he said, and she said...

NOBODY CARES.

 

[aveatry]

FFS it doesn't matter a toss whose picture it was as long as it's verified.
STFU the lot of you!
You lied. NO you lied. No but yes but you we were wrong first and you always lie. But you never admit you're wrong . Yes I do but I'm not....
But he said, and she said...

NOBODY CARES.

except you seem to care enough to take the time to write and tell us how much you do not care. But other than that you have summed it up perfectly