Slashing the boats in shallow water, now

Anyway - notch yet again shows us that when he has lost an argument - BBC boat pictures that he then takes the thread off track. - Standard MO that everyone sees from you :rolleyes:
You implied the BBC shows only migrant boat images which include women and or children.

But you haven’t proved that.

So you are simply wrong.
 
I am afraid you wasted your time searching for something that does not say

You can not even troll properly.
Aveatry thinks 1000ppm CO2 is optimum level for the world.

Here he is saying so:

“The level of 1000 PPM CO2 is very close to the optimum level of CO2 required, given no other limiting factor, 1200 PPM, to allow a plant to photosynthesis at the maximum rate.”
 
You implied the BBC shows only migrant boat images which include women and or children.

But you haven’t proved that.

So you are simply wrong.
I agree with Justin -- You are completely boring. There was no implying of ONLY - that bit was just living in your head.
 
Aveatry thinks 1000ppm CO2 is optimum level for the world.

Here he is saying so:

“The level of 1000 PPM CO2 is very close to the optimum level of CO2 required, given no other limiting factor, 1200 PPM, to allow a plant to photosynthesis at the maximum rate.”
Take it over to the climate thread where it belongs and stop pushing your nonsense on this one
 
I agree with Justin -- You are completely boring. There was no implying of ONLY - that bit was just living in your head.
Your post was implying the BBC shows bias.

You are too cowardly to say directly what you mean.

This is the post, you were making it very obvious you think the BBC picks images with women and children.

Well I suppose now then we will finally be seeing all the women and children arriving in the dinghies like the bbc keep telling us they contain.
 
If you want to read that into it then that's up to you - you are either autistic and take things literally or you just like arguing.
Here is the chain of conversation. You are quite tedious 1000ppm

1) You believe more co2 will be beneficial for crops

2) You believe the optimum level is 1000ppm

Here are the screenshots that prove it.

IMG_0141.png

IMG_0140.png
 
Take it over to the climate thread where it belongs and stop pushing your nonsense on this one
You brought it up on this thread, so I’ve debunked your lies on this thread.

I am happy to debunk you lies on the climate thread and make you look even more silly if that’s what you want.

Poor Aveatry, a silly little conspiracy theorist
 
Aveatry thinks 1000ppm CO2 is optimum level for the world.

Here he is saying so:

“The level of 1000 PPM CO2 is very close to the optimum level of CO2 required, given no other limiting factor, 1200 PPM, to allow a plant to photosynthesis at the maximum rate.”
Serious question, Notch.
Are you housebound through some ailment or disability?
 
Serious question, Notch.
Are you housebound through some ailment or disability?
this morning I went shopping with the wife, then went and cut my MILs beech hedge, this afternoon I went on a 5 mile walk with my dog and now Im setting out tiling for the bathroom floor and cutting the decoupling mat

Im just about to start making a courgette rosemary and pork risotto whilst my wife practices the piano


so not really housebound, no. :giggle:
 
this morning I went shopping with the wife, then went and cut my MILs beech hedge, this afternoon I went on a 5 mile walk with my dog and now Im setting out tiling for the bathroom floor and cutting the decoupling mat

Im just about to start making a courgette rosemary and pork risotto whilst my wife practices the piano


so not really housebound, no. :giggle:
Quite a productive day then. (y)
Please try to be like that more regularly, it simply isn't good for anyone to be online all day.
 
Back
Top