Lucy Connolly to be freed

[Deleted member 317777]

Because you propose that proof that gammon is a racist term would be failure to provide any other examples. That is a logical fallacy.

I’ve never said it was racist, have I ?

I say it’s hate speech

 

[motorbiking]

Because you propose that proof that it is racist would be failure to provide any other examples. That is a logical fallacy.

It’s the reverse.

You’d have to argue that it’s a unique insult based on skin colour that isn’t racist. While all the other insults based on skin colour are racist.

Given nobody can think of a single one, means it has to be unique. I think that is unlikely.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

It’s the reverse.

You’d have to argue that it’s a unique insult based on skin colour that isn’t racist. While all the other insults based on skin colour are racist.

Given nobody can think of a single one, means it has to be unique. I think that is unlikely.

He will leave the chat now……

 

[MNW67]

It’s the reverse.

You’d have to argue that it’s a unique insult based on skin colour that isn’t racist. While all the other insults based on skin colour are racist.

Given nobody can think of a single one, means it has to be unique. I think that is unlikely.

Utter nonsense.

You are setting up a logical fallacy in order to try to win an argument.

 

[motorbiking]

I’ve never said it was racist, have I ?

I say it’s hate speech

Its unnecessary. Attack the argument, the belief, the opinion, just don’t make it about skin colour and pretend.

 

[MNW67]

I’ve never said it was racist, have I ?

I say it’s hate speech

Sorry, I thought you were following motorbiking's line.

 

[motorbiking]

Utter nonsense.

You are setting up a logical fallacy in order to try to win an argument.

A derogatory insult based on skin colour is either racist or not racist. If it’s not racist, then give me another example applicable to a different skin colour.

 

[MNW67]

A derogatory insult based on skin colour is either racist or not racist. If it’s not racist, then give me another example.

I am not going to endorse the terms of your logical fallacy.

 

[motorbiking]

I am not going to endorse the terms of your logical fallacy.

Just one will do.

 

[MNW67]

Just one will do.

YAWN

You have had my answer three times.

I will not accept your premise, how ever many times you repeat your faulty straw man logic.

 

[motorbiking]

YAWN

You have had my answer three times.

I will not accept your premise, how ever many times you repeat your faulty logic.

What is the basis that you argue this particular slur based on the colour of a persons skin is not a racial slur.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

YAWN

You have had my answer three times.

I will not accept your premise, how ever many times you repeat your faulty straw man logic.

It’s not straw man, it’s the truth, and you know it.

We’ve already established the term ‘gammon’ is derogatory and hate speech.

MBK has made a very, very good case for it being racist too.

 

[motorbiking]

Consider the alternative. The person making the hate speech is the one who decides if it’s hate speech or not. It has to be about other’s perception as per the met police response to the question.

The alternative is the Lucy C’s of this world can simply say I wasn’t motivated by hate of a racial group.

 

[MNW67]

It’s not straw man, it’s the truth, and you know it.

We’ve already established the term ‘gammon’ is derogatory and hate speech.

MBK has made a very, very good case for it being racist too.

I never use it myself because I know some/many people find it offensive.

I am still undecided on whether it is hate speech or racist. There are articles arguing both sides.

 

[motorbiking]

I never use it myself because I know some/many people find it offensive.

I am still undecided on whether it is hate speech or racist. There are articles arguing both sides.

I agree. I prefer not to refer to colour. Call them a berk an idiot etc. no need to bring skin colour in to it.