Which builder were you referring to then in the case I quoted.
-
Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.
Angela rayner tax dodger again...
- Thread starter motorbiking
- Start date
Which builder were you referring to then in the case I quoted.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,768
- Reaction score
- 5,336
- Country
I don't know how many times I have say this:
- she told Hove council it was a 2nd property for council tax purposes.
- she told HMRC it wasn't for stamp duty purposes.
This is not a case of "bad advice".
Nobody seems to wonder how a Labour MP with no other sources of income that I know of, can give away their main house and still afford to buy an £800k seaside flat. I’m not the only one who wonders about that. I saw this online.
"Angela Rayner’s Take Home Pay Barely Covers Her Property Bills
Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, receives a substantial salary of approximately £159,584 per year. After income tax and National Insurance contributions, her monthly take home pay is estimated at £8,323.
However, when considering the costs associated with her property holdings, her disposable income appears significantly constrained. Now our Angela has never had a high income job, and has always said she was from humble beginnings, so you can reasonably assume there is no giant nest egg sat somewhere. Estimates suggest that her monthly bills for her properties, including mortgage payments, council tax, and standard living expenses, total around £8,086.
Breaking down the costs:
Mortgage payments on her Hove seaside apartment and Ashton-under-Lyne home account for the largest portion of her expenses.
Council tax for both properties adds approximately £410 per month. But where did a vast deposit come from? Where did the stamp duty obligations come from? Someone who claims to earn very little as a carer and a single mum, has only been on the higher earning in Parliament for just over one year.
I know carers and single mums, both of which could not afford to purchase the most modest of homes. Even if topped up with some extra from Union work it would take a while.
Routine living expenses such as utilities, water £200, gas £150, electric £450, groceries £600, and transport £600 are estimated at £2,000 monthly. Is everything being expensed?
With monthly expenses nearly matching her take home pay, Rayner would be left with just £237 as surplus income, would that have passed a standard stress test? What about the fact she will be out of a job in just 4 years? While this technically covers her financial obligations, it leaves minimal room for discretionary spending, unexpected costs, or additional lifestyle expenses.
Unless additional sources of income are not being declared, or this is a massive ‘gift’ from someone, this raises questions about how her lifestyle is being financed. Given the scale of her property holdings and the apparent tiny gap between income and expenditures, something does not add up. What do you think? Maybe her humble upbringing means she can live on nothing?"
"Angela Rayner’s Take Home Pay Barely Covers Her Property Bills
Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, receives a substantial salary of approximately £159,584 per year. After income tax and National Insurance contributions, her monthly take home pay is estimated at £8,323.
However, when considering the costs associated with her property holdings, her disposable income appears significantly constrained. Now our Angela has never had a high income job, and has always said she was from humble beginnings, so you can reasonably assume there is no giant nest egg sat somewhere. Estimates suggest that her monthly bills for her properties, including mortgage payments, council tax, and standard living expenses, total around £8,086.
Breaking down the costs:
Mortgage payments on her Hove seaside apartment and Ashton-under-Lyne home account for the largest portion of her expenses.
Council tax for both properties adds approximately £410 per month. But where did a vast deposit come from? Where did the stamp duty obligations come from? Someone who claims to earn very little as a carer and a single mum, has only been on the higher earning in Parliament for just over one year.
I know carers and single mums, both of which could not afford to purchase the most modest of homes. Even if topped up with some extra from Union work it would take a while.
Routine living expenses such as utilities, water £200, gas £150, electric £450, groceries £600, and transport £600 are estimated at £2,000 monthly. Is everything being expensed?
With monthly expenses nearly matching her take home pay, Rayner would be left with just £237 as surplus income, would that have passed a standard stress test? What about the fact she will be out of a job in just 4 years? While this technically covers her financial obligations, it leaves minimal room for discretionary spending, unexpected costs, or additional lifestyle expenses.
Unless additional sources of income are not being declared, or this is a massive ‘gift’ from someone, this raises questions about how her lifestyle is being financed. Given the scale of her property holdings and the apparent tiny gap between income and expenditures, something does not add up. What do you think? Maybe her humble upbringing means she can live on nothing?"
She sold the other house to her son's trust.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,768
- Reaction score
- 5,336
- Country
Not quite.
Who put the money in the trust to enable the trust to buy her house?
It's near enough for explaining the basic principle to Mottie.
It was some sort of award made to her son. It looks like some sort of medical compensation.
Have you just taken specialist tax advice?
Angela Rayner paid what she was told was due within the 14 days.
She has said she was given wrong advice and needs to pay an additional sum......different to your twisted interpretation.
Your claim she "confessed to not paying it" implies she deliberately didn't pay....a thoroughly dishonest interpretation, which we all know is who you are, it's what you do.
Why can't you just state things honestly for once in your life
So she says, we might get the full story soon.
Second to the grace and favour residence
Second to the home in Ashton, thats her primary address.
More logical fallacies. You can't help yourself.
Indeed.
She told Hove that a home she didn't own (the Ashton one) was her main residence.
Nothing wrong with that.
