Angela rayner tax dodger again...

[noseall]

So not tax evasion.

Thank you for admitting it's not tax evasion

I think you have 12 months to rectify an underpayment.

No, not tax evasion at all. Go Angela!

 

[Murdochcat]

I haven’t defended her

I’ve stated the facts as we know them in the public domain.

Unlike Motorbiking stream of stating things which haven’t been said

You have defended her repeatedly

 

[Murdochcat]

Do you really believe that AR understood the tax implications of her son's trust; an esoteric point of tax law, and then deliberately withheld that information from her tax adviser and conveyancer.

I wonder if the lawyer who set up the trust outlined this issue to Rayner and her ex husband.

They’ve been quick to distance themselves from this unfortunate mess

 

[Murdochcat]

Go Angela!

The best advice you can give. It’s time to go Angela

Spending part of the NHS compensation on your new flat is very smelly

 

[motorbiking]

I think you have 12 months to rectify an underpayment.

No, not tax evasion at all. Go Angela!

Its a good job you have a part time day job.
The deadline is 14 days for stamp duty. but there is a grace period for payment up to 30 days
Standard penalty is 5% for 30+ days late and another 5% for 90 days+ up to 1 year. + 8% Interest on the period.

If they believe you were reckless or careless, as seems to be the case here - then they can impose 20-30% for the evasion. That is the figure the FT and beeb are using.

 

[fillyboy]

Its a good job you have a part time day job.
The deadline is 14 days for stamp duty. but there is a grace period for payment up to 30 days
Standard penalty is 5% for 30+ days late and another 5% for 90 days+ up to 1 year. + 8% Interest on the period.

If they believe you were reckless or careless, as seems to be the case here - then they can impose 20-30% for the evasion. That is the figure the FT and beeb are using.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel isn't it.

 

[blup]

Your stupidly has no limits.

She either failed to ask the right person, didn’t share the necessary information or decided not to follow it.

If you under pay and have not avoided it it’s evasion.

She was non compliant, not evading tax. Hence the civil penalties.

 

[motorbiking]

It's like shooting fish in a barrel isn't it.

he does make it easy.

She was non compliant, not evading tax. Hence the civil penalties.

If HMRC believe the evasion was due to negligence/recklessness or carelessness, they have the power to impose higher penalties. These are the amounts being discussed in the FT and Beeb. Nobody is suggesting her position was fraudulent.

She is yet to explain, why she told hove council it was a 2nd property and HMRC it wasn't.

 

[noseall]

She was non compliant, not evading tax. Hence the civil penalties.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel, isn't it.

 

[MNW67]

Its a good job you have a part time day job.

At least he doesn't think that Monday to Friday means three days a week like you seem to

 

[Notch7]

You have defended her repeatedly

You need my posts and read the actual words, not you think you've read.

I've stated the facts that are in the public domain not Motorbikings opinions

 

[motorbiking]

At least he doesn't think that Monday to Friday means three days a week like you seem to

oh dear, is this going to be another case of you saying I said one thing only to find I didn't.

 

[blup]

I give her up to a week to 1 month.

At the moment, though, Starmer is backing her quite strongly, which suggests he doesn’t want to lose his Deputy Prime Minister so soon after the election. Unless there’s a smoking gun or the story continues to dominate headlines, she could last longer than a week.

Would be great if she's sacked, but maybe even better if he keeps her, as the stench will linger and any legitimacy Starmer has will disappear.

She will stay but has been damaged

 

[MNW67]

Once again the morons can't understand basic English.

The law defines tax evasion as intentional acts designed to defraud or deceive HMRC.

 

[motorbiking]

You need my posts and read the actual words, not you think you've read.

I've stated the facts that are in the public domain not Motorbikings opinions

Nope.

You've ignored her confession in the sky new interview and you've clearly not read her detailed statement.